What area did they close only to NR hunting?Closed sheep hunting to NR in an area.
They closed it to non-res. only? Sorry, I'm an idiot, I can't seem to find where to access that info on my own. Also, sorry to the OP for derailing your thread.
Voted today at around noon so took a bit to update actions. Prop 204 is 19C. Prop 73 at the same link is what relates to this thread to try and keep things relevant.They closed it to non-res. only? Sorry, I'm an idiot, I can't seem to find where to access that info on my own. Also, sorry to the OP for derailing your thread.
I would imagine that right there is a large reason the limit was changed.I have a trip booked for 24’ very disappointing to hear. I will not be going back for deer again
I would think otherwise. I’ve bowhunted Kodiak 5 times and taken 2 deer more often than 1. Being limited to 1 deer flips the decision. As crazy as this may sound, paying ~$6K for the prospect of 2 deer was OK to me but for 1 I will pass.I wonder how many hunters who have a boat based transporter lined up will now change their mind and not go. Probably not many but I’m sure some won’t think the trip is worth it for just 1 deer.
I was in the 7%… Sweet!FYI: 66% of nonresident hunters shoot 1 deer, 27% shoot 2, 7% shoot 3.
What area did they close only to NR hunting?
What area did they close only to NR hunting?
2009-2018: estimate 350-400I was in the 7%… Sweet!
Interesting… Just go right past two deer to one deer… sounds fishy.
How’s the reindeer population??
I don't know know why you would spend that much to shoot three of them.Idk why id spend the money to come from lower 48 for 1 deer now. If I'm going to spend $2500 -4k bucks I'd like a little more to chew on then that.
I think you're pretty spot on. A transporter even gave comments at the meeting that it's out of control. The pilot I use won't even drop people on the salt after October 1st anymore. Some claim there's a camp every couple miles of shoreline in October and November plus a couple dozen boats. Seems every year in my quick search there are a few new boat operators each time I look. There were a few proposals to limit and restrict transporters in Unit 8 but the board does not have authority to regulate transporter activity. So I agree that's large part of why this action was taken. The same local that submitted those proposals also submitted prop 73.I could be completely wrong in my assessment but I think it in part addressed transporting without actually making changes to their regulations.
They're not. With social media, youtube, and forums sending more and more people to various places to hunt each year, things eventually need to be restricted. Kodiak has been the place everyone has been talking about as the next great affordable adventure the last few years and now we're seeing the results. No different than when Newberg has a video titled "Why you should he hunting Colorado OTC elk as a NR every year" and then when its overrun and needs a bit of restriction its all the fault of the greedy residents.Why are all the animal populations falling so much? Is it the harvest? Most NR shoot bucks/bulls...
According to the public comments, everyone and their dog claims they were cancelling their trip if this proposal went through. We will see.I wonder how many hunters who have a boat based transporter lined up will now change their mind and not go. Probably not many but I’m sure some won’t think the trip is worth it for just 1 deer.