- Thread Starter
- #41
General RE LEE
WKR
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2019
- Messages
- 1,847
I’m trying to decipher what I’m reading on the target. Was there a tracking failure?
Does this mean we can look forward to more evals in the scope field eval subforum soon?
I’m trying to decipher what I’m reading on the target. Was there a tracking failure?
I knew I had seen a bad review about the LRP optically, and just saw it mentioned here which reminded me where I saw it. So not only are they not durable (per sample of 1), they also optically suck in their price range (per sample of 1).
Optics Comparison
Purpose As a competitive shooter, we often hear the question of which optic is best. While there are many components of an optic that contribute to the overall quality and its ability to perform, this review only focuses on optical clarity/resolution. The definition of clarity and resolution for...www.kineticsecuritysolutions.com
To my eyes it(lrp) looked worse than the v4 across the mag rangeI knew I had seen a bad review about the LRP optically, and just saw it mentioned here which reminded me where I saw it. So not only are they not durable (per sample of 1), they also optically suck in their price range (per sample of 1).
Optics Comparison
Purpose As a competitive shooter, we often hear the question of which optic is best. While there are many components of an optic that contribute to the overall quality and its ability to perform, this review only focuses on optical clarity/resolution. The definition of clarity and resolution for...www.kineticsecuritysolutions.com
We do need a retest with better rings.
I think the optics quality is average, I have trouble seeing the grey reticle on the Mil version. I don't have any trouble seeing the reticle in the MOA version. The Kahles and Minox glass are better to my eyes.Interestingly, both @Ryan Avery and I haven’t thought the glass was anything special either. Him on two, me on one sample.
Interestingly, both @Ryan Avery and I haven’t thought the glass was anything special either. Him on two, me on one sample.