Sounds like a good combo. I have hunted for a number of years with the following system:
Base layer > Peleton 240 > Arcteryx Atom > Kifaru LPP
Every year I reevaluate my gear and I have yet to find any fault with this for Oct and Nov hunts in CO Rockies (10k ft+ Oct, 8-10k ft Nov). Moves enough moisture, never too hot or cold, it just works. If it's going to be on the warmer side I bias towards my silkweight base while if it's colder I tend to use the Aerowool base layer. I keep looking at all the new choices available but I haven't seen a definitive reason to pull the trigger on one of the new mids yet.
If it were much warmer I might look to move more moisture. Perhaps the Ambient would be better than the 240? I did use a Kelvin Active one year when it was warmer during 1st rifle. While it was OK, I missed the wind protection of the 240. The beauty of the 240 is that changing winds makes almost no difference. With the Kelvin Active I could go from warm to chilly in the same temps just based on wind. It's like finding a scope that always dials correct and never needs re-zero, you'll never put up the nonsense again. For me it's the same with layers that handle wind. I will not be without a mid that resists wind for hunting. If I were cross country skiing, hiking at a good pace extensively, or other high energy activities then my priorities would shift and moving moisture would be more important.
Back to the topic at hand, I do look forward to reading more about how they perform and am always open to a better mousetrap.
Edit: I also have a Kutana Hybrid. It was only available a couple years apparently. Did the Kenai replace it? Seems similar.