Is it all Leopolds

[Schmo]

Thats because there are no problems with Leupolds......it's all in their heads(the RS anti-Leupold gang).

I wonder if that’s why an optics dealer for multiple brands, that was not associated with Rokslide, said that Leupold scopes were having problems and he didn’t recommend them.

 

[TaperPin]

I have a hard time with current production Leupolds, regardless of reliability because the new CEO has been so quick to strip the company of the custom shop and eliminate scopes that aren’t top sellers - both things that shooters used to really like about the company. Now it’s all about corporate profit for the shareholders - consumers are a distant second.

I get a kick out of seeing Leupolds on the Rokslide Riihimäk rifle (correct term for Tikka), so thanks to anyone that uses them. Lol

 

[KenLee]

I must be the only nf fanboy that doest own one bc I think their reticles suck for hunting.

Reticles suck and glass is meeeeh

 

[Jake Larsen]

Reticles suck and glass is meeeeh

I agree with both of these statements. Best glass I’ve ever seen on a scope was a Swaro Z5 I had. But I will say, neither the glass or reticle has cost me an animal. And it didn’t take long before I don’t really even notice either “issue”. They’re not severe enough to cause a real problem in my experience. If I could choose a different reticle I would, but the MilR is usable enough for me. I dial and hold for wind almost exclusively anymore, which this reticle works just fine for. And the glass is by no means bad, it’s just not the most stunningly amazing out there.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[ElPollo]

One can waste a lot of time there.

And you can waste a lot of time ammo and money by not paying attention to them.