Is it all Leopolds

I find this to be way off base. You're just trying to tell everyone how much money you have and how much better and smarter you are with out saying it.
You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. I have 4 leupolds and shoot probably more in a week than the average person shoots in 10 years. Ive went through over 4000 small rifle primers in the last year alone. I bought my last case in Oct of last year. Thats not counting large rifle or pistol.

They only one I ever had to re-zero was one where my sling broke and the rifle hit the ground. It was about 5 moa off. Tge ocular was actually dented. I re-zeroed it and kept hunting. Sent it in later.
I love how you ASS-ume things.
Leupolds just plain work for what they are. Show me other scopes from 40 years ago that still work and hold zero. And hold their value. If they didn't then people wouldn't buy them. People speak with their wallets every day. I'm so glad you are "flexing on the poors" or at least you think you are. I'm sure NF is the only scope that works

My leupold that lost zero and cost me a giant deer cost more than the nightforce I replaced it with.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Had the scope taken a fall or just was that much off from day in, day out shift? Can you recall what distance was the shot? Always interested to know the background. It's a shame to lose a big one or any for that matter. I gather to a miss-hit, and he got away.
 
Had the scope taken a fall or just was that much off from day in, day out shift? Can you recall what distance was the shot? Always interested to know the background. It's a shame to lose a big one or any for that matter. I gather to a miss-hit, and he got away.

Scope took no falls that I was aware of. Drove from MT to WY, gun rode in a case. Put it on a backpack, hiked in several miles and set up a spike camp. From there, I hiked to a glassing spot and back to camp for 6 days. Went on a stalk for this shot on the 6th and final day of the hunt. Shot was 280 yards. Missed, didn’t know why. I was stable, the shot felt right. Got pounded by a massive snowstorm that night, left. Checked zero, was 4” low at 100 yards, verified by another shooter because I couldn’t believe it. I had spent several days scouting that buck, and had hunted him for 7 days during archery. 190+ clean typical. Still the biggest buck I’ve seen on the hoof by far. It really burned me up, because it was at a time when I had saved for months for that scope and spent way more than I should have, just to be let down in the worst way possible. Then I started searching online, and very quickly found the threads on every hunting/shooting forum out there going back many years discussing these exact issues. I tested the turret with a tall target test, and found it wouldn’t return to zero reliably. Sent in to Leopold, they verified the issue and replaced parts. That was enough of the great golden ring for me…


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I work part time as a RO at our public range and yesterday 4 people show up to check there zeros the 4 of them traveled from back east at least 20 hours away... All 4 where shooting Leupold scopes cds dials vx3 and the other 3 where vx5 or 6.... All 4 scopes needed to be zeroed again they where off by a couple inches left or right high or low... Every one of them swear they where zeroed before they left.. And I see this often. I see way more leupolds and vortex fail than any other scope.
 
Thats because there are no problems with Leupolds......it's all in their heads(the RS anti-Leupold gang). If you don't shoot a Tikka, topped with a SWFA, Trijicon or NF set in UM rings...you are shooting garbage. Period. End of story.

you-serious-clark-eat.gif


I'm not sure if you are serious or just trolling?

Maybe rokdlide is the first forum you've ever been on.......but here's a quick post that predates rokslide. I'm sure there's more, this was just on the first page of the search. I've sent back and sold multiple failed reopolds. Maybe they work for you, if so I have still have 1 left. An m8 gloss friction adjust 6x42. It's on the floor under the bench because it shit the bed. Maybe it's fine and is just me, if you want to buy it it is for sale.


 
I work part time as a RO at our public range and yesterday 4 people show up to check there zeros the 4 of them traveled from back east at least 20 hours away... All 4 where shooting Leupold scopes cds dials vx3 and the other 3 where vx5 or 6.... All 4 scopes needed to be zeroed again they where off by a couple inches left or right high or low... Every one of them swear they where zeroed before they left.. And I see this often. I see way more leupolds and vortex fail than any other scope.
So you made the determination it was the scope and not the ammo, atmospherics, mounts, torque, shooter error, etc? Just curious.
 
My leupold that lost zero and cost me a giant deer cost more than the nightforce I replaced it with.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Opportunities at big deer are so rare......losing one to a scope failure is a giant kick to the nuts. I never lost a deer due to a scope failure. I sure had some odd hits though. Aiming at the high shoulder and hit the deer middle of the back. This was back when I shot vortex rifle scopes. Most of the times I hit the deer weird I would check zero and it would be mucho off. I am grateful that now my rifle set up, if I make a bad shot or miss, it's almost gauranteed all on me and not a guess on what happened.
 
Opportunities at big deer are so rare......losing one to a scope failure is a giant kick to the nuts. I never lost a deer due to a scope failure. I sure had some odd hits though. Aiming at the high shoulder and hit the deer middle of the back. This was back when I shot vortex rifle scopes. Most of the times I hit the deer weird I would check zero and it would be mucho off. I am grateful that now my rifle set up, if I make a bad shot or miss, it's almost gauranteed all on me and not a guess on what happened.
Yeah that sucks big time. I had the same thing happen to me while shooting at a 190" buck shooting a Tikka 695 7mag topped with a Swaro A 3-5-10x42. Finally managed to kill the buck after an ass shot, gut shot, and finisher from 10 yards after tracking him to his bed. Shot the poor thing to pieces.
 
Thats because there are no problems with Leupolds......it's all in their heads(the RS anti-Leupold gang).
I wonder if that’s why an optics dealer for multiple brands, that was not associated with Rokslide, said that Leupold scopes were having problems and he didn’t recommend them.
 
I have a hard time with current production Leupolds, regardless of reliability because the new CEO has been so quick to strip the company of the custom shop and eliminate scopes that aren’t top sellers - both things that shooters used to really like about the company. Now it’s all about corporate profit for the shareholders - consumers are a distant second.

I get a kick out of seeing Leupolds on the Rokslide Riihimäk rifle (correct term for Tikka), so thanks to anyone that uses them. Lol
 
Reticles suck and glass is meeeeh

I agree with both of these statements. Best glass I’ve ever seen on a scope was a Swaro Z5 I had. But I will say, neither the glass or reticle has cost me an animal. And it didn’t take long before I don’t really even notice either “issue”. They’re not severe enough to cause a real problem in my experience. If I could choose a different reticle I would, but the MilR is usable enough for me. I dial and hold for wind almost exclusively anymore, which this reticle works just fine for. And the glass is by no means bad, it’s just not the most stunningly amazing out there.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
279 posts later... good closure to this butt hurt train wreck for both sides.
If only . . . For whatever reasons I read this entire train wreck of a thread and am now contributing to it. About halfway through I began wondering how one joins the Form cult and whether they have cookies, offer door prizes, or if you have to pay dues, attend services, or brand yoruself or something. Same questions for the anti-Form cult. I'll consider joining either cult for good cookies.

I get a kick out of seeing Leupolds on the Rokslide Riihimäk rifle (correct term for Tikka), so thanks to anyone that uses them. Lol

I hesitate to ask, but why is "Riihimak" the "correct term for Tikka"? I ran a google search but only looked for about 10 seconds. Is that just the town in Finland where they are made or is there something more clever behind this quip?

I'm one of the guys who still runs a Leupold VX5 on a Tikka. I'll even include pics to brighten your day. It's chambered in 30-06 if helps/hurts the comedy factor for you here.

1733185138726.jpeg

1733187021408.jpeg


* * *

In all seriousness, I often ask myself essentially the same question posed by the OP: If so many Leupolds are used and recommended by so many folks, are they really all that bad? If top-level competitors and the .mil use them, surely they must be okay/good enough for me, right? Surely if I buy another one I'll get a good one, right? (My questions are rhetorical. I understand what the drop tests are supposed to show and others' reasons for why they don't use them anymore---don't flame me.) I really WANT them to be golden because I really WANT to get a Mark 4HD 2.5-10 FFP. But I haven't yet.

Because I'm also one of those guys who checks his zero before every hunting season and after every long road trip with the rifle. And I DO have to re-zero sometimes when I get there after I zeroed just before leaving. Anecdotally, my VX5HD seems less prone to this than the VX3HD. I've made multiple trips out west and up mountains and back with the Tikka/VX5HD with it holding zero the whole time. But that one time I had adjust it when I got there, and adjust it again when I got home, with the same batch of ammo. That one time is enough to put nagging doubt in a person's mind. The VX3HD has seemed to shift after a much shorter ride in the pickup in a padded hard case.

Now, I'm not willing to say that I've ruled out othe things causing the apparent shift. I use lightweight Talley rings that I (some random guy who drives a desk for a living) installed; and I haven't bedded either of these rifles. And, somewhat embarrassingly considering how OCD I am about taking notes on other things, I haven't really tracked my zero methodically. That's something I plan to do over the next several months before next season. But that brings me to another point/question.

One of the reasons I have never really thought much about having to tweak the zero on my rifles over time is that I'm constantly changing loads or batches of components or whatever. I buy components in bulk for my "target" rifle, but I may only buy 50 or 100 Nosler Accubonds or whatevrer at a time for my 30-06 or other hunting rifles. When I switch lots, I expect it to shoot to a slightly different point of impact, and so I expect to have to re-zero my rifle with this year's load before heading out. Same thing if I buy factory ammo---I expect different lots of the same ammo to shoot to slightly different POIs, so I expect to have to re-zero. Is that something you experience? If so, I guess the cure is buying in bulk so all components are in the same lot (or just re-zeroing every time something changes, as I'm doing now).

FWIW - My non-Tikka rifle with the VX3 took a nice buck this year. Of course, that was at a meager 75 yards and I zeroed the week before, so I'm not making any claim here other than there's now meat in my freezer.

1733186888736.png
 
Last edited:
So you made the determination it was the scope and not the ammo, atmospherics, mounts, torque, shooter error, etc? Just curious.
It was the same ammo they used to zero their rifles before they left so it wasn't the ammo if the scope mounts where loose would they have been able to get there rifles zeroed again? And what the hell does atmospherics have to do with a 100 yard zero? I can tell U they rode in sum kind of hard cases under the pick up cap for 20 plus hours maybe the poor leupolds couldn't take the bouncing shimming and vibrating and lost there zero... I owned three leupold cds and sold them all several years ago when two out of the three wouldn't dial correctly after changing bullet weights to a lighter bullet...
 
Scope took no falls that I was aware of. Drove from MT to WY, gun rode in a case. Put it on a backpack, hiked in several miles and set up a spike camp. From there, I hiked to a glassing spot and back to camp for 6 days. Went on a stalk for this shot on the 6th and final day of the hunt. Shot was 280 yards. Missed, didn’t know why. I was stable, the shot felt right. Got pounded by a massive snowstorm that night, left. Checked zero, was 4” low at 100 yards, verified by another shooter because I couldn’t believe it. I had spent several days scouting that buck, and had hunted him for 7 days during archery. 190+ clean typical. Still the biggest buck I’ve seen on the hoof by far. It really burned me up, because it was at a time when I had saved for months for that scope and spent way more than I should have, just to be let down in the worst way possible. Then I started searching online, and very quickly found the threads on every hunting/shooting forum out there going back many years discussing these exact issues. I tested the turret with a tall target test, and found it wouldn’t return to zero reliably. Sent in to Leopold, they verified the issue and replaced parts. That was enough of the great golden ring for me…


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That's a heartbreaker for sure. The fact they verified it was broken at least let's you know it wasn't you. Did they say what had failed?
 
That's a heartbreaker for sure. The fact they verified it was broken at least let's you know it wasn't you. Did they say what had failed?

They rebuilt the erector. Not uncommon for the CDS as it turns out. I think there’s been at least one other story in this thread with a similar problem. When this happened, I found reports of serious issues with the CDS going back to its inception on multiple hunting/shooting forums.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top