5MilesBack
"DADDY"
And just like the rest of the conspiracy theories, it proves itself true........"without any evidence at all". Another of their idiotic propoganda lines they love to spew. SMH
Then the states will ignore the fact it was overturned. Do not comply.
Any lawmaker introducing or supporting Unconstitutional laws need to be removed from office. what do they take an oath for If not gonna follow it? sounds like treason punishable by a noose. Fuggin crooks and liars.
Control, control, control. It is unreal how many voters "want" to be sheep, but then also "demand" that everyone else be sheep as well.......while voting in wolves. SMHSingle-shot and bolt actions are okay. "You may keep those, but not the other". So saith the collective...
Sheep, yes, and it’s easy to get sheep because a vast majority are so uneducated on issues like this.Control, control, control. It is unreal how many voters "want" to be sheep, but then also "demand" that everyone else be sheep as well.......while voting in wolves. SMH
Welcome to the United States of America.Control, control, control. It is unreal how many voters "want" to be sheep, but then also "demand" that everyone else be sheep as well.......while voting in wolves. SMH
I am under the impression that the bill actually goes after any semi-automatic rifle with a detachable magazine.Martin Heinrich (D) NM is the author. The bill goes after mechanics, not appearance. Gas operated firearms with detachable magazines, in a nutshell.
He talked about how dangerous these "weapons" were in a press conference about the bill's introduction.
The widely popular Ruger 10/22 is one of those this bill attacks. Single-shot and bolt actions are okay. "You may keep those, but not the other". So saith the collective...
I read the Meateater summary, and it was pretty decent.I am under the impression that the bill actually goes after any semi-automatic rifle with a detachable magazine.
It does provide exemptions for rimfire rifles, so I think the 10/22 is okay.
I am under the impression that the bill actually goes after any semi-automatic rifle with a detachable magazine.
It does provide exemptions for rimfire rifles, so I think the 10/22 is okay.
It’s not about preventing gun violence, it’s never been about that, because if it was they would be trying to ban handguns. Like you said, handguns account for more deaths per year. I’ve said this before but it will be easier to get support to ban AR type weapons than handguns. Let’s say AR type weapons get banned, yet gun violence doesn’t go down, what’s next…handguns, and on down the line."...the bill defines “gas-operated” as including blowback-operated and recoil-operated systems as well. These systems are less common in high-powered rifles, but their inclusion expands the ban to include virtually every type of semi-automatic rifle and many AR-type pistols. In fact, the GOSAFE Act is broader and more restrictive than other types “assault weapon” bans because it would prohibit rifles like the Ruger Mini-14, a semi-automatic rifle that does not usually get caught up in gun bans."
This is probably the most interesting and confounding part of the bill.
"Most modern semi-automatic handguns chambered in 9mm or .45 ACP are recoil operated, but some (like many models from gun company Hi-Point) are blowback operated. It is unclear why recoil-operated handguns were exempted, but others were not.
The handgun exemption is also noteworthy because, according to the FBI, handguns are used in the vast majority of homicides in the U.S. In 2022, handguns were used in 41% of homicides while rifles of any kind were used in 3%. (Hands, fists, and feet were also used in 3% of homicides, while knives or cutting instruments were used in 8%.)"
So vast majority of murders are committed with handguns, and more people are killed with edged weapons and just as many are beat to death, but they're going after rifles. Just another affirmation of the type of non-data or logic based decision making happens in congress. Must be going after "long guns" because they're scarier.
I read the proposed bill text and it appears that it will come down to the interpretation of “combination of parts” by the DOJ/ATF.If passed I’m assuming this would also eliminate the ability to buy replacement components, ie bolt carrier, gas blocks, etc?
The “common sense” people don’t have any desire for independence anymore.
It scares me to think about what this country would be like if they got what they want.
Isn’t Heinrich the big hero of sportsmen and endorsed by BHA and other sportsmen organizations? I don’t bring that up to discount the work he has done for wildlife conservation. It may start to divide the pro-hunting constituency and that’s the last thing we need.