This 100%Agreed, I didn't even click on the videos, I got the gist and I'm confident I don't care to watch it from the description by the OP.
Hate the guy but got to agree here. First shot is perfectly find broadside shot. Second shot the shooter was definitely to the left of the camera and did seem like he was some distance away so we really don’t know exactly what the shot angle was.It’s clear to me that the buck was on the move. It did not look like he was gonna stay still for long. There was nothing unethical about the first shot. He obviously made a perfect shot and dropped it. Angle was fine. I don’t think there was any option of waiting for a better angle. That angle was plenty good.
The whitetail shot was iffy, but most tipped bullets handle steep quartering pretty well.
Those are just the ones we have found out about…If I remember correctly.
1. Shot a turkey in the wrong unit in Utah.
2. Convicted of trespassing once in Utah.
3. Convicted of trespassing once in Idaho.
But why do people support them still? Well according to a thread about a sponsorship...and then a podcast
1. Who cares?
2. You are just participating in "cancel culture" if you do boycott them and/or their sponsors. Those are only just the ones they have found l
Just stop giving these people clicks... Even if you don't subscribe, he still got a view from these being watched.
Until you and the other guys stop clicking, he will continue to make money and be on the TV/Youtube screen.This is true, but there is something to be said for bringing negative attention to people like this. Take a second and write his sponsors an email letting them know how you feel about the fact that they support a dude who has been convincted for poaching three times over. Give them a call too.
View attachment 805011
I honestly do believe the next decade will decide the fate of hunting for our kids. If we don't hold people like this dude accountable as a community, we are toast.
Until you and the other guys stop clicking, he will continue to make money and be on the TV/Youtube screen.
Was generalizing... can see how it sounded diff.Do you have any evidence that I've ever clicked on anything associated with an influencer? I attached a screenshot of a post one of his sponsors made so guys could write said sponsor with their opinions. Using that information to give them negative press coverage is the best way to destroy these peoples' ability to market themselves.
Side note, a fun game is to go down the comments on posts like that. If you see an outfitter or other company supporting them, send that profile a message letting them know you won't buy from brands that associate with poachers. Really gets them in their feels.
I did contact Outdoor Life and a couple other places including NRA when that von dingbat stole the lady's deer last year. Still pisses me off.
Likely.We have way more pull than we realize I think. End of the day, these people are just marketing tools, and if 1/10th of the people who are turned off by influencer antics actually wrote these companies with their opinions, the problem would be solved.