First animal with my Tikka T3x in 6.5cm. Shot it at 297 yards
That's a good goat!
First animal with my Tikka T3x in 6.5cm. Shot it at 297 yards
Love the carbon fibre barrel and 3lb Razor combo….
What happened to the forend?View attachment 513323View attachment 513324View attachment 513325
I just recently got a Bravo stock and did have concerns about the added weight. Turns out I love that stock so much that I couldn't care less about the slight added weight!
Looks like it doesn’t have the plastic shell on it.What happened to the forend?
Tell me about it! You're not the first person to give me s*** about it. It's actually the 4-27 and it's heeeeaaaavy. I bought if for comp shooting (this is also my comp gun) but it was the only quality scope I had at the time that I could rely on out in the field. I've since procured an LHT that's less than half the weight. You work with what you've got right?Love the carbon fibre barrel and 3lb Razor combo….
Nice looking rifle though.
Is that the 3-18 Razor?
I thought the contrast was funny, its a very nice looking rifle.Tell me about it! You're not the first person to give me s*** about it. It's actually the 4-27 and it's heeeeaaaavy. I bought if for comp shooting (this is also my comp gun) but it was the only quality scope I had at the time that I could rely on out in the field. I've since procured an LHT that's less than half the weight. You work with what you've got right?
Don’t have any good pics but had a buddy with a mill go to town on it and it may have lost a couple oz but that’s it. It seems most the weight to be lost would be in the plastic shell and buttstock…I’ve been contemplating this. I haven’t looked to much at it yet but think a guy could drill or dremel out some of the center metal area in the forearm area and leave the edges. Not sure how much it would save in weight or loose in rigidity.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yup. And now MDT have just come out with their field rifle stock which is .2 lbs / 90 grams heavier than the Bravo ...If KRG would get their sh!t together and make a modern version of the Bravo in a functional weight they could own the market.
I’ve sent them an e mail as have others. Lip service. Nothing has changed in construction materials or design.
Lotta opportunity for a manufacturer who will listen and build their produc correctly.
Yup. And now MDT have just come out with their field rifle stock which is .2 lbs / 90 grams heavier than the Bravo ...
Yup. And now MDT have just come out with their field rifle stock which is .2 lbs / 90 grams heavier than the Bravo ...
I'd really like to shoot an NRL hunter but there's none in my immediate area and I'm lazy. I do shoot PRS with it. With the Razor on top it comes in close to 12lbs, which is heavy for a hunting rifle and very light for PRS. It's a 6.5 Creedmoor so the recoil isn't bad but it just forces you to have solid fundamentals in order to see impacts. That said, with the LHT on top it's hovering around 10lbs which is way more manageable as a hunting rifle. I throw the Razor back on top for PRS and add forend weights (inside and out) and an internal grip weight, and I can get it around 15 lbs. Still light but waaaaaay easier to spot impacts (let's me be far sloppier).I thought the contrast was funny, its a very nice looking rifle.
Do you shoot NRL hunter with it?
I'm guessing its a pretty heavy setup, too light for PRS so must barely be under 16lb?
What reticle do you have in your Polar?View attachment 513323View attachment 513324View attachment 513325
I just recently got a Bravo stock and did have concerns about the added weight. Turns out I love that stock so much that I couldn't care less about the slight added weight!
@General RE LEE have you weighed the UPR stock? Curious how it'd compare to the bravo.
After more time, how do you like the two strictly from a shooting function standpoint? I love the grip on the bravos, skeptical i'd like the UPR as much.