So is defining what a trophy is to you the first step, cause I'll be honest, I'm thoroughly confused as to where I should and should not apply.
There is no one right answer. A lot of it depends on what you want (and that may change). There are certain things to keep in mind for each state though. Here are questions to ask yourself, and then use the answers and some additional research to guide your applications...
- How much can you spend in upfront fees as well as out of pocket fees?
- What species are you interested in hunting and what are most important to you to hunt?
- Are you interested in units that are likely to produce the next world record, or in units that would produce a great representative of the species?
- How quickly do you want to hunt? Are you willing to wait?
Based on those answers, research the states and the various units. Learn what kind of animals each of the units are producing. Learn the allocation between non-residents and residents. Learn how the draw works and how the bonus and preference points are used. Learn if you can even draw a unit you are applying to. Build a strategy that meets the answers to the above questions. Here's my take on the pros and cons for each state:
Arizona: Pros - tremendous trophy potential; two choices on your application are considered; cheap per species up-front fees. Cons: 20% of tags reserved for max point holders (this means the 10% non-resident allocation always goes to the top point holders for the most exclusive units) therefore hard or impossible to draw best units for decades; have to pay up-front hunting license fee (if you apply for one species, apply for all)
Colorado: Pros - cheap non-refundable fees; great trophy quality for most species (not so much for elk); landowner tags and OTC tags supplement draw opportunities. Cons - pure preference point system for elk, deer, antelope (three preference points are needed before you can draw moose, sheep, or goat)
Idaho: Pros - OTC opportunities; best sheep odds in the west, everyone has the same odds. Cons - Expensive (have to buy license); can basically only apply for one species as a non-resident
Montana: Pros - tremendous trophy sheep; bonus point squared system means you can draw in year one. Cons: Expensive applying for deer and elk, quality of deer and elk not like other states
Nevada: Pros - bonus point squared system, cheap to apply for a number of species, can apply for two (sometimes three) sheep species, great trophy potential, landowner tags available for some units. Cons - have to buy license up front
New Mexico: Pros - everyone has the same odds, great trophy elk, cheap per species fee; landowner tags available Cons - High upfront application costs
Oregon: Pros - no point system for sheep. Cons - have to purchase license up front, deer and elk tags are tough to draw and trophy quality isn't there like other states
Utah: Pros - tremendous trophy potential in LE units, relatively cheap application costs, potential to draw the first year (25% of the tags go to random draw. For units with less than four tags, all go in a random draw). Cons - Tags are difficult to draw.
Washington: Pros - trophy potential and high hunter success for moose, sheep, goat; bonus point squared system. Cons - $112 per species to apply.
Wyoming: Pros - great hunting opportunities with low points (same as Colorado); most sheep tags in the west. Cons - expensive up front costs and sheep points are expensive; hard to draw tags (75% go to applicant with the most points)
As you can imagine, those are only some of the details on each state (and I was getting tired writing that) haha Hope that makes it a little clearer (I know I know...clear as mud!).