A couple things, first the temporary units and "COVID-only" stuff that was set up, i can really only talk about my metro area specifically, required shutting down other spaces. There was a good six months where there were no elective surgeries. Knee or hip replacement? Tough luck, see you in September. Nobody had the money to build and staff all knew facilities. Setting up temporary ICUs as was done in some places is also ridiculously expensive, and it's not something you can do indefinitely, again because of staffing issues.
The issue with unvaccinated people is not just soaking up the extra bedspace, but it's typically the unvaccinated people who are also spreading it, not wearing masks, harassing people who have been wearing masks in public, promoting the nonsense conspiracies, etc. That paints a big target.
Cost for one, space for another. Same reason you don't get admitted to the hospital the minute you get a cancer diagnosis or the flu. The side effects of monoclonal antibodies are pretty rough and they cost . I dunno maybe I'm crazy to think that after 18 months of dealing with it we've got the standard of practice pretty down pat.
Betadine nasal spray carries the risk of allergic reaction, surface reactions on mucosal surfaces, and can open the body up to secondary infections. Nothing is without risk.
Deaths post-vaccine have been pretty well monitored by drug producers, every government, and several independent research bodies. Unless you're gonna come in with the VAERS nonsense again (a tool that is used to identify trends, but does not and is not intended to identify cause and effect) You're pretty far afield claiming nobody is talking about it. The truth of the matter is that there's nothing exciting about it.
To say "nobody is looking at the numbers of young people with myocarditis" I would say is also a myth. Again, our population surveillance is pretty good, but I suppose that by phrasing it that way you have something specific in mind. But I would also wager that you heard about it from someone else, probably directly or indirectly through a news or social media outlet, from one of the surveillance bodies, which would mean that it is being discussed. I know a couple of the usual suspects (FLCCC, infowars, mike adams) have made a habit of misreading preprints to and exaggerating the data, and then never following back up or correcting themselves.
An example of people literally talking about it:
https://newsroom.heart.org/news/you...e-myocarditis-side-effect-of-covid-19-vaccine
But guess what causes long-term symptoms, even in children, at much higher rates?
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/long-term-effects/index.html
And myocarditis specifically?
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7035e5.htm
What I don't see discussed as much from the anti-vax or "it's not that serious" crowd is the long-term symptoms that come from exposure, while reaching for any vaccine side-effect (real or imagined). To me that's a classic case of shooting three holes in a backstop and painting the bullseyes on after the fact.