Here's a question for members from W. VA. since it was mentioned:West Va, enough said.
If a husband and wife from W VA get a divorce, are they still considered brother and sister?
Eddie
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here's a question for members from W. VA. since it was mentioned:West Va, enough said.
You stated in your other post, "If you are, have been or are engaged in hunting or fishing, wildlife officers do not need a warrent to search you, your gear, or your vehicle."And to think, I was going to say pretty close to the same thing, except for supporting my facts. Who wudda guessed that such programs teach opposite things. Like I said, cops, sherrifs and state police are taught criminal law, not wildlife law. Cops, sheriff and state police do not enforce wildlife law. He'll, they can't even demand to see a hunting license. But hey, you know it all, so I don't even know why I'm trying, but maybe @mtwarden will chime in, if you'll take his word for it.
I never referenced Montana. Perhaps you should read everything I wrote in this thread, so you get an actual understanding and be able to make cogent relevant comments, as I have never limited my comments to a single state. Furthermore, Montana's state regulations do NOT void federal law, nor federal wildlife officers ability to enforce them. You are clearly attempting to argue around your limited knowledge, while refusing to consider facts you are unaware of. The old saying comes to mind: when one thinks they know everything, there is no room to learn. I suggest you read through what I've written, with an open mind. As what you are saying, will get people in multiple states charged.You stated in your other post, "If you are, have been or are engaged in hunting or fishing, wildlife officers do not need a warrent to search you, your gear, or your vehicle."
Since you want to reference Montana, a simple one minute internet search returns State vs Boyer, 2002. There doesn't appear to be any other case law in Montana that addresses wardens and searches since 2002. The Montana Supreme Court in their decision wrote;
"A warden may search, without a warrant, any tent not used as a residence, any boat, vehicle, box, locker, basket, creel, crate, game bag, or package, or their contents upon probable cause to believe that any fish and game law or department rule for the protection, conservation, or propagation of game, fish, birds, or fur-bearing animals has been violated."
The Montana Supreme Court states PROBABLE CAUSE is required for a warden to conduct a search. The Boyer case takes a turn based upon the circumstances, but you can read all about it. It still doesn't change what we are discussing. Specifically in MT, I would be wrong about a tent and cooler, but they still require PROBABLE CAUSE for a search. In other states, wardens may need a warrant. Again, warrants are issued on, yeah you guessed it, PROBABLE CAUSE.
Administrative inspections allow for such things as game check stations, and in some states traffic stops, depending on state statute. During these inspections a warden, sometimes any employee of GF, can ask for your license and demand you produce any game in your possession. Again, they can't search your vehicle at a check station without probable cause.
The only reason I care about this is some young kid will think just because they were hunting they have to allow a warden to search their person, vehicle, or gear based upon reading your highly inaccurate postings. It's just Urban Legend.
The mentality of some you guys is surprising to me. Game wardens are absolutely hunters friends unless said hunters are breaking the rules. They are there to protect what we value so much as hunters.
If some guys would invest the time to truly know the rules and regulations, it would eliminate so much stress and change perspectives. It's a great feeling for me to see a game warden while I'm hunting. I know I'm doing everything right and I'm happy they are out there trying to make others to do the same.
For quite a while in PA we had a lot of deputy game wardens who were real asses. They were bound and determined to find something with every encounter to write a ticket for. (No. I never got a ticket.) Some years ago, the PGC finally revamped the whole program and those on a power trip were driven out.
Can you post or link to what you wrote above?So many people think fish and wildlife law is the same as criminal law, i.e., they think there is no difference between being stopped by a cop-police-sherrif or a fish and wildlife officer. They are completely wrong. Wildlife laws are Prima Facia laws. If you are, have been or are engaged in hunting or fishing, wildlife officers do not need a warrent to search you, your gear, or your vehicle. As such, if you appear to potentially be, have been... doing anything illegal, but you haven't, you are better off answering relevant questions, as if you don't, the warden will have no choice but to cite or arrest you. And you be be left with no option but to defend yourself in court.
Only been stopped twice. I try to be respectful and then we are both on our way. I’m in south central Pa and both time they were fine.In another long thread, there was a general consensus to STFU and refuse to answer game wardern's questions.
I see the point but I wonder where to draw the line
M:e hello
GW: Hello, can I see you hunting license?
Me: Sure. Here it is.
GW: Where have you been hunting?
GW: How long have you been hunting today?
GW: Can I check your waterfowl shotgun to make sure you have your plug?
GW: Did you get anything?
GW: Can I see you fish/game?
GW: Do you have permission for this field? From whom?
GW: Etc. Etc
I have had many encounters. I have readily answered all those questions. The GWs always did their jobs and moved on.
It seems that refusing to answer those questions would have immediately escalated the situation.
How do other folks deal with these encounters?