How to deal with game wardens?

I think it varies greatly by state. Here in IL I've had 4 interactions, all fine, but much more by-the-book. I had one really great interaction here though. My daughter shot a buck in December on a friend's property. We suspected the deer was dead but never found it. I called the warden in that county in January and said we'd be antler hunting with the hope of finding what was left of her deer. I wanted to be ahead of it since it was out of season and it would require a salvage tag. He said if we find it to call him, but to drop an onX pin on the carcass and take pictures, and he would come out and give me a salvage tag. Well I got lucky and found the deer. I called him and he said he was too far away to come tag it. He advised me to use our automated check-in process online, but since it was out of season it would likely throw a red flag. He said we have a documented text chain and if a flag gets raised he'd take care of it. I checked the deer in online and nothing ever came of it. That dude was extremely helpful and happy we at least found the deer.

I've hunted Wyoming a ton and I must say those wardens are true professionals. I think I've talked to half a dozen over the phone after I'd drawn a tag and they were nothing but welcoming and helpful. My son had a bull tag this year and I was on the phone for 30 minutes with the warden while we both tooled around on OnX and discussed places to look for elk. He had no reason to do that and it was greatly appreciated.
 
I never mention what I’m seeing in terms of animals. It’s always “too hot real slow” and if I have one in the cooler being checked, I’m as vague as I can get about the “where” as they will sell your spot out quickly! They may even hunt themselves.
 
Did a ton of work with them on access programs,in the 90's roads, gates fences, sign in kiosk's, etc. Most all the guy's we camped with for days or weeks were very interesting to say the least. All good people with lots of good stories. I can honestly say , never had a problem in hunting several different states for over 40 plus years. I think it is a tough job with low pay in most places. I know in my home state they offered me a job as a field mechanic/welder for just over $10 bucks hour in 1990. Union scale at the time was well over $30 plus. Long hours and low pay just saying. :sneaky:
 
No negative interactions in Wyoming.

I had several interactions with one long serving warden, since retired, who had a bit of a “straight laced,” sometimes almost “deadpan,” personality in the field. Strictly business, but he was never unprofessional or haughty. I later discovered he was pleasant enough on a personal level.

I had several interactions with another who was sort of a good ol’ boy type. He checked me then offered to use his horses and help me pack a cow elk if I got one during a late season hunt. He’d tell you where the activity was during late season cow hunts, but he wasn’t going to tell you where he’d seen a big bull. Why should he?

I thought the Wyoming G&F did an outstanding job on the Mark Uptain Grizzly attack case.

I think it’s sort of funny that the perspective seems to be about a hunter having to “deal with” a warden. Does it occur to anyone that the warden is also having to “deal with” you? He’s getting paid to do it, but it’s not always fun. Usually, he’s the interaction that happened in your life that day. But you might be one of a dozen interactions that happened in his life that day. No wonder some of them can come off as strictly business.
 
I hunted 20 years in NY and never once spoke to a game warden, was never checked in the field. Never saw one in the field.

In WY during hunting season they have Biologists and all field staff checking tags and licenses. Not sure how it works but Im guessing if they find a violation, they call the game warden to come issue citations and deal with it.

I go out of my way to talk to anyone from Game and Fish when I see them. They are all amazing, helpful and encouraging..there is only one game warden who has a reputation for being a dick and in my interactions with him, he has been, but hes also not looking to bust or drill you for any little thing.

Overall, no fear or nervousness around Game and Fish.

Sent from my SM-S931U using Tapatalk
 
I never referenced Montana. Perhaps you should read everything I wrote in this thread, so you get an actual understanding and be able to make cogent relevant comments, as I have never limited my comments to a single state. Furthermore, Montana's state regulations do NOT void federal law, nor federal wildlife officers ability to enforce them. You are clearly attempting to argue around your limited knowledge, while refusing to consider facts you are unaware of. The old saying comes to mind: when one thinks they know everything, there is no room to learn. I suggest you read through what I've written, with an open mind. As what you are saying, will get people in multiple states charged.
I don't need to re-read what you have written. Not once in this conversation have you bought a foundation based in law. All you brought were snide remarks.

You are now saying the feds can do whatever they want, bwhahaha. Post up the SCOTUS or any district court of appeals case law that says US Fish & Wildlife can violate your 4th Amendment rights. At this point, I would take a federal regulation that states US Fish & Wildlife officers can search any person or vehicle without probable cause citing the Administrative Inspections exception due to hunting and fishing being highly regulated. Just give me something other than running your fingers about how stupid I am.

The reason I posted about Montana was because you tagged a retired game warden from there. I guess you didn't like actual case law regarding wardens in MT. It's starting to become obvious you're not one for facts or actual law.
 
I don't need to re-read what you have written. Not once in this conversation have you bought a foundation based in law. All you brought were snide remarks.

You are now saying the feds can do whatever they want, bwhahaha. Post up the SCOTUS or any district court of appeals case law that says US Fish & Wildlife can violate your 4th Amendment rights. At this point, I would take a federal regulation that states US Fish & Wildlife officers can search any person or vehicle without probable cause citing the Administrative Inspections exception due to hunting and fishing being highly regulated. Just give me something other than running your fingers about how stupid I am.

The reason I posted about Montana was because you tagged a retired game warden from there. I guess you didn't like actual case law regarding wardens in MT. It's starting to become obvious you're not one for facts or actual law.
Actually I have provided a rock solid foundation, but you simply refuse to do a few minutes of research to verify I'm correct; that is on you. As such, going back and forth with you is pointless. You are stuck on what you think you know, and unable to even consider anything that differs. That sir, is a sad state to be in.
 
I had one try to write me a ticket for "Interference" once. The warden said that I told another goose hunter "The game warden was coming down here to check licenses."

When he jumped me and threatened me I told him: " I didn't tell them you were coming. I told them that you just told me there was 7 minutes of legal shooting light left...."

He stormed off. Man that guy was a douche.

I would still like to punch the a$$hole that told him that......
That's one I think I would have been inclined to ask to be cited and make the effort to go to court. I for sure would like to see how that played out if challenged.
 
I have an honest and general question of Probable Cause and 4th amendment re: Hunting

I have a decent understanding of the application of PC and 4th amendment in my position. Which are firearms, narcotics, etc.

Arms reach, access to glove boxes and "anywhere you could hide or secret same".

Is part of the "issue" or question.....could you fit a grouse in a glove box? Yea An extra trout? Sure.

I am not at all familiar with the threshold of how reasonable-ness plays out or looks like in game violations.

What articulable facts need to be stacked in a game violation to reach PC? Be interesting to hear.

Exiting a known hunting area, wearing orange, and being present during date/time of lawful hunting I wouldn't think reaches PC.....

Most PC is created at the typewriter. I would guess a Warden with several years of typing is rather good at it.


Admitting you were hunting when passing a Warden as you drove out of a hunting area I don't think would be found Reasonable for PC either. Not even sure Reasonable Suspicion.
 
I hunted 20 years in NY and never once spoke to a game warden, was never checked in the field. Never saw one in the field.

In WY during hunting season they have Biologists and all field staff checking tags and licenses. Not sure how it works but Im guessing if they find a violation, they call the game warden to come issue citations and deal with it.

I go out of my way to talk to anyone from Game and Fish when I see them. They are all amazing, helpful and encouraging..there is only one game warden who has a reputation for being a dick and in my interactions with him, he has been, but hes also not looking to bust or drill you for any little thing.

Overall, no fear or nervousness around Game and Fish.

Sent from my SM-S931U using Tapatalk

One of my few interactions with Wyoming game wardens, the guy pulled his truck up, sat down, and started glassing with us. We told him what our plan was and asked for his input. He gave us the pros/cons of two possible routes and info on the locals' habits. He couldn't have been more pleasant.

Same for the guys at the check stations.
 
Yeah they sure as hell are not searching my truck/pack/etc without a warrant.
From an enforcement standpoint (again...I am NOT a fish cop) I think you're very wrong.

Your vehicle is a mobile conveyance, and I would guess your feet ie- your ability to run or walk away while the warrant was being created and approved...is the entire work around to many Search and Seizures.

Not for certain, but think I am pretty close
 
Search the open fields doctrine and administrative searches under the open fields doctrine. It is easily searchable, depending on how you word your search.
I typed this phrase into google:
“open fields doctrine and administrative searches with game wardens”

Google AI spit out this:
The Open Fields Doctrine allows game wardens (and other law enforcement) to search undeveloped private land without a warrant because the Fourth Amendment doesn't protect "open fields," even with "No Trespassing" signs. While federal courts generally uphold this, state constitutions may offer greater landowner protection, leading to ongoing legal challenges and some state court rulings restricting warden access, emphasizing the tension between wildlife enforcement and private property rights.
 
With respect until that's not reciprocated. Have had roughly 30 interactions with wardens across 7 different states and one interaction with a CO in Canada. All were cordial except 2.
 
^^^ personally NOT a fan of this. Kinda shitty on Private. Think we've read MANY examples of this being utilized in this thread.

Probable Cause that a violation has occurred and accessing Private land vs entering private lands to snoop and investigate? Not so much
 
Back
Top