180ls1
WKR
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2020
- Messages
- 1,163
I dont believe this is correct, you cant shoot someone inside your "castle" in the back as they are walking out with your items in hand. Thats not my understanding of castle doctrine, your life still has to be threatened.
This hypothetical isnt the question here either, returning to camp is.
Someone could argue life by deprivation of life essential items but that would be a really really weak argument to make if you can just hike out.
I wouldnt try to think of hypotheticals to justify pre-determining actions using force thats a great way to get convicted. Bottom line, was your life in immediate danger, and were your actions reasonable. More important than studying castle doctrine is what reasonable means here.
Yeah, I believe the courts would largely be concerned with what is considered reasonable.
It would be reasonable to shoot someone entering your tent to rob you, if you are already in there sleeping or whatever.
It would not be reasonable to see someone in your tent from a distance, then proceed to enter the tent as well and shoot them claiming castle.