archp625
WKR
I'm in the process of listening to his podcast that came out today. I know my thoughts, what are yours?
I can give my point of view. He basically got in trouble for filming hunts without a film permit. They showed up at his house. They gave him a ticket because he was not there for 3 weeks. He was pissed because he knew the rules and basically his brand got bigger and he never got the permits. So he basically pled that he was innocent by ignorance.I can't listen to Brian. Care to offer a brief synopsis?
I agree. Randy gets permits and the other people that do not hunt private. Randy seems to handle the permits just fine. I think I am more annoyed how he did not really want to own up to it and basically wanted to make excuses.Rules are Rules even if dumb and outdated.
don’t like the campaign to turn them over
I can give my point of view. He basically got in trouble for filming hunts without a film permit. They showed up at his house. They gave him a ticket because he was not there for 3 weeks. he was pissed because he knew the rules and basically his brand got bigger and he never got the permits. So he basically pled that he was innocent by ignorance.
Then he proceed to get made because the feds make it so hard to get a film permit and bitched about the method. Had a guy on there agree to what he was saying. Then I turned it off.
I wish at my job we could not get permits then have employees get pulled over and get pissed at just act like we didn't know.
There was a legal ruling on commercial filming in national parks just a few days ago. The judge ruled that filming is protected under the 1st amendment and that requiring and charging for permits is unconstitutional.
Judge: Commercial Filmmakers Don't Need Permits In National Parks
A federal judge has struck down as unconstitutional the National Park Service's practice of charging commercial filmmakers who want to shoot in the National Park System, ruling it is a protected activity under the First Amendment.www.nationalparkstraveler.org
There was a legal ruling on commercial filming in national parks just a few days ago. The judge ruled that filming is protected under the 1st amendment and that requiring and charging for permits is unconstitutional.
Judge: Commercial Filmmakers Don't Need Permits In National Parks
A federal judge has struck down as unconstitutional the National Park Service's practice of charging commercial filmmakers who want to shoot in the National Park System, ruling it is a protected activity under the First Amendment.www.nationalparkstraveler.org