Sorry for the delayed reply. I was out of town all week and not online. To answer your question - I went with both!

I got the Jolene S first because it was slightly less expensive than the Enticer S Ti and published weight with direct thread mount was about .5 oz less. Even though I eventually got the Enticer S Ti I think this was a great purchase, and the perfect can for the gun that I have it on. As said before, it is super light and at a great price (I paid $599). I initially put it on my Christensen Ridgeline 300WSM with 20" carbon fiber barrel, and while it was definitely quieter than the Omega 300 that I had used previously, it did not give enough recoil reduction to allow me to see impact. I moved it to my Tikka T3x Lite in .243 that I use for coyotes, and I expect it will never leave that gun! Very quiet with minimal recoil. As a matter of fact, I think it actually shoots just as soft with the Jolene S as it did with the Fat Bastard muzzle brake. Bottom line: Jolene S is a tremendous lightweight titanium can at a great price. I have shot it on the same guns as my Enticer S Ti, and neither myself nor my friends can honestly say which is quieter. They are both great. The only knock that I have on it is that it cannot accept a muzzle brake. More on that and the Enticer S Ti in a minute.
After my experience with the Jolene S on my 300WSM I decided to try the Enticer L Ti. Got this can for $785, which I thought was a great price, and I added a Dead Air E-brake for another $99. When I add the suppressor to my 300WSM I found that it was noticeably quieter than the Jolene S, and it gave better recoil reduction allowing me to almost see my impact. I then tried it with the E-brake, and BOOM, I finally got the result I was looking for! While it was a tad louder with the brake, the Enticer L Ti paired with the Dead Air E-brake was still very comfortable on the ears, and even more comfortable on the shoulder. Also, weighing a total of about 12 ounces with the direct thread mount it kept this gun under 8 pounds with my Vortex Razor HD LHT and mounts. I can't find anything negative to say about this suppressor, and if I could only have one silencer in my arsenal, this would be it.
Finally, after the success I have with the Enticer L Ti I decided to try the S Ti on another very light gun, my Christensen Ridgeline 6.5x284 Norma with 22" carbon fiber barrel. Once again, the recoil reduction and sound reduction were both very good with the suppressor alone, and I can see my hits without the E-brake. However, I like the fact that the Enticer suppressors have the option of adding end cap accessories to the front, as if I keep this gun I will probably opt to add the E-brake for hunting alone to mitigate the recoil even more.
Bottom line: All three are GREAT suppressors in terms of weight, price and sound reduction. Head to head I can tell no difference in the sound signature of the Jolene S and the Enticer S Ti on any of my guns. I have weighed both, and the Jolene is lighter (.4 oz) and slightly less expensive. Therefore, if you think you will never need to add and endcap accessory, I would probably give the Jolene the egde. However, the weight and price difference is so slight that the versatility that the Enticer gives with the removeable end cap makes it a real toss-up as to which is better.
Two things I should note: 1) I had heard rumors that at least one of these scopes could compromise accuracy. In my experience, this has definitely NOT been true. As a matter of fact, with certain rounds I actually saw smaller groups in some cases. 2) I had the chance to get an Enticer S (steel) for $425 last weekend, and I jumped on it. It is still in jail, but I will let you know how it does as soon as I get a chance to play with it!