- Thread Starter
- #81
I had a Colorado ewe tag once and hiked in on a trail well before daylight. Not having any luck, I hiked out with my rifle over my shoulder. I had no idea how popular the trail was. I had to have met 50 or more hikers on the way out. Some of them almost shit themselves when they saw me. I don't know how many times I was asked what I was hunting and then heard "You can hunt those?".
If I'd had blood to my elbows and a broken down ewe in my pack complete with a ewe head, some of them would have needed therapy.
I was polite to them all.
When I’m using popular trails for access, I have found that having a rifle cover such the the solo hunter or similar seems to effectively disguise a rifle to the majority. It’s interesting as they don’t seem to associate wearing a orange vest and hat (or optics) with hunting and they don’t seem to notice a rifle that is covered even if it clearly looks like a rifle. In fact, based on how many times folks have asked about the fishing, they assume it is a fishing Rod. Weird.
^not advising that anyone go out of their way to be “incognito”, but if you don’t feel like getting looks of suspicion or comments, it seems to work. What spurred this discussion for me is I was hiking on a unauthorized but maintained horse trail that is not on any maps while I was out bear hunting. It’s a great access point that allows me to bypass using a popular hiking trail so that I can effectively hunt the entire time I’m hiking. It also has lots of berries. Encountered a lady who said, “don’t shoot my dog!” I hiked out on the popular trail that evening with a rifle cover on, saw 20+ people and nobody said anything or stared at the rifle. So, my personal A/B test is that a rifle cover is largely effective.