Bubblehide
WKR
- Joined
- May 13, 2015
- Messages
- 3,978
See that is the thing, I didn't read anywhere that he knew BEFORE he shot that the animal was caged. ....
You also didn't read that he didn't know. Based on the evidence, it is reasonable to presume (Not assume) that he had to know the animal was in a cage, prior to shooting it. Additionally, any owner of a trap, including F&W are required to have their information on the trap. It would have been simple for the guy to get the owner info (F&W) and report the incident. He chose not to.
From what you have stated, it sounds like we both agree on everything, except the severity of the crime. As such, we both have differing opinions on the severity. I have no problem with a person holding a different opinion than I. After all, we are all entitled to form and maintain our own opinions.