atomicathlete
FNG
Interesting...
Some are easier than other, to determine their stance.. Others hide very well.. Look at Non-profit partners and the like..How about north face, arcteryx, outdoor research, Rab, etc.
Is there an easy way to see where each company stands?
Here's some info on Arcteryx.. Look into the grant recipients and their missions..How about north face, arcteryx, outdoor research, Rab, etc.
Is there an easy way to see where each company stands?
Some folks on here say live and let live thats fine until they come to your back 40 and bring in outside influences to determine what you can and can't do. I try and be vigilant where I buy gear trying to use US companies when I can and certainly stay away from any anti hunting companies if at all possible. Its time for hunters to draw a line in the sand and say enough or in a generation or two things may look very different for hunters and not in a good way.
Is FL good to buy? Being owned by Meateater who is owned by Chernin
Someone gets it.
"Wait, now they did an international petition on 'trophy deer hunting' in the midwest and it's gonna be illegal to hunt whitetail next year unless you're native american? Maybe we should talk about this one..."
Nope, live and let live remember? At least everyone is entitled to their opinion that it sucks not being allowed to hunt a healthy population in your backyard!
To clarify once more I don't really care about a companies "stance" on hunting. I just assume as a rule of thumb basically all backpacking/mountaineering companies might be ok with me shooting a deer or elk in their jacket but would probably have an issue if I was wearing it in a picture holding a dead wolf...I can't see Rinella in the same situation making a public statement saying that while he supports meat hunting he doesn't support "trophy predator hunting," if he did maybe I would sell my FL gear and go back to that cotton t-shirt in a rainstorm but I wouldn't really care if my buddies continue to support them. If Rinella was in my backyard actively lobbying against legal hunting, using FL dollars to do so and successfully stripping my rights away on the other hand I would probably burn it all and highly recommend my friends and associates to vote wisely with their dollar.
No not actually. they only took what they needed and did not abuse the land. To think they exercised predator management is absurd. The introduction of white men and their greed is what wipes out most population of many species in many areas.No, the person who trapped a mouse to utilize the hide would be a trapper - opposite of your definition of a wolf hunter.
Did natives of the North American continent actively hunt predators strictly for management purposes? I'm ignorant on this subject and genuinely interested.
All of the Patagonia gear I've seen is made overseas. How's that paying a good wage? On that front they're no different than any other corporate entity. Pay low wages overseas, import, charge big money, make a big profit. They may pay their employees stateside a decent wage but that comes on the back of someone else overseas. I could care less about Patagonia, it's a status symbol for high school and college kids these days.There's hardly a there there, imo. Its founder hunts and fishes, they makes great gear for fishing, and the company absolutely hemorrhages cash into protecting public lands, including areas where we all hunt and fish. Hell, Patagonia even designs specialized combat gear for US Special Operations Forces.
Sure, it's disappointing when the actions of some associates or locations don't line up with my own values. But even if they're not absolute hunting fanatics, their conservation work benefits us in huge ways.
But I tend to be more of a pragmatist, and value that their gear is top-notch, that they stand behind it and repair it at no cost to you, and that they're an American company paying their workers a good wage. For me, Patagonia's values and initiatives are close enough to my own, even though it's not lock step with everything I believe.
We can balkanize anything...it's quite fashionable these days to insist on some weird form of unadulterated allegiance to what we want to hear. Some companies are genuine when they cater to that. Others could care less but know if they pander to you, you'll buy their$hitfine products.
All of the Patagonia gear I've seen is made overseas. How's that paying a good wage? On that front they're no different than any other corporate entity. Pay low wages overseas, import, charge big money, make a big profit. They may pay their employees stateside a decent wage but that comes on the back of someone else overseas. I could care less about Patagonia, it's a status symbol for high school and college kids these days.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
No not actually. they only took what they needed and did not abuse the land. To think they exercised predator management is absurd. The introduction of white men and their greed is what wipes out most population of many species in many areas.