What if I'm a sportsman and look at the ecosystem as a whole? What if I don't think management for maximum hunting opportunities is the best way?
“Harmony with land is like harmony with a friend; …l
The problem with your rainbows and unicorns theory…..is the real world.
I too want nature to be in harmony.
There are many advantages to using Hunters to manage wildlife;
1) Hunters are easily regulated.
2) Tags and quotas for ungulates can be easily ramped up or down- some seasons have an objective that can be stopped mid season.
3) Hunters contribute $$$$$ to do this managing essentially a self perpetuating system.
4) hunters are selective in their killing
Wolves have none of those advantages, and in addition have many disadvantages
1) The cost to F&G is enormous, EIRs, studies, investigations of livestock predation and then THERE ARE THE BARRAGE OF LAWSUITS.
2) wolves will kill as many animals from a herd as they can- whether they eat them or not
3) wolves are not selective
4) wolves are very difficult and costly to control once established
5) historically, these wolf populations HAVE NOT BEEN CONTROLLED and go way over objectives
The insinuation that Hunters are not far better solution to manage our ecosystem solution over wolves is just falling for the lie the antis are pushing.
Wolves are indiscriminate brutal killers…. not exactly the way the anti-‘s portray them on TV to fool people, Eh?
.