Can we legalize suppressors now?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Antares

WKR
Joined
Jan 13, 2021
Messages
2,081
Location
Alaska
I’m not trying to get your panties bunched up. I literally thought he encouraged republicans to vote it down. I guess I’ve got some reading to do.
 

magtech

WKR
Joined
Feb 15, 2018
Messages
340
Location
Michigan
Why is it when i take a crap on a thread it gets me a temp ban.

But here you are, not even talking about how we can get silencers deregulated.

If i wanted to hear nonsense about border bill politics id consult the view.
 

amassi

WKR
Joined
May 26, 2018
Messages
3,885
Considering its the government, I wouldn't be surprised if the dollars in don't even cover the costs to run the department.

Bingo
Firearms don’t even sniff the revenue that BATFE receives from alcohol or tobacco


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

amassi

WKR
Joined
May 26, 2018
Messages
3,885
I doubt things in CA will change anytime soon but the amount of red that appeared during the election this year was impressive. Hopefully you guys can keep moving in that direction.
View attachment 787926

That 2024 map sure looks like it’s time to split Californias electoral college votes up by district.

The hill we need to climb is only getting taller. Republicans are moving out of state and democrats keep throwing out feel good freebies to appease their base.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

arlenter

FNG
Joined
Nov 5, 2024
Messages
9
Please enlighten us on what that "border bill" would have done?
Sure -

We have an asylum problem in the US, not an illegal crossing problem.
Immigrants can come in and claim asylum. Since our system is so backed up with these claims... PER our current LAW - we have to let them in the country first, and give them a slip to return for their court date to hear their asylum claim to see if it's legitimate or not. Many, once they are in the country, never return for their court date, and stay illegally. Even if most do return for their court dates, waiting times can be backed up for a year or more. Meanwhile more people keep coming in.

We can't get around this process - it's literally the law... but what the bill would have done is.

1. provide substantial funding to hirer more judges, and more border patrol agents to process these claims faster. So they could INSTANTLY process their asylum claim as legitimate or not, and either legally let them in, or deny them and send them back.

2. passed a new law to allow us to completely/instantly shut down the border if immigrant entries reach 5,000/day. A power that we currently do not have. The border would be completely shut down - no matter who was trying to get in.
 

Reburn

Mayhem Contributor
Joined
Feb 10, 2019
Messages
3,388
Location
Central Texas
Sure -

We have an asylum problem in the US, not an illegal crossing problem.
Immigrants can come in and claim asylum. Since our system is so backed up with these claims... PER our current LAW - we have to let them in the country first, and give them a slip to return for their court date to hear their asylum claim to see if it's legitimate or not. Many, once they are in the country, never return for their court date, and stay illegally. Even if most do return for their court dates, waiting times can be backed up for a year or more. Meanwhile more people keep coming in.

We can't get around this process - it's literally the law... but what the bill would have done is.

1. provide substantial funding to hirer more judges, and more border patrol agents to process these claims faster. So they could INSTANTLY process their asylum claim as legitimate or not, and either legally let them in, or deny them and send them back.

2. passed a new law to allow us to completely/instantly shut down the border if immigrant entries reach 5,000/day. A power that we currently do not have. The border would be completely shut down - no matter who was trying to get in.

What does this have to do with suppressors? The topic of the thread.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top