Can we legalize suppressors now?

[HingleMcCringleberry]

Umm, did home boy not help kill the border bill because the immigration issue was central to his campaign?

Please enlighten us on what that "border bill" would have done?

 

[Antares]

Please enlighten us on what that "border bill" would have done?

https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/4361

 

[HingleMcCringleberry]

https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/4361

So you don't know.

News flash, that was not needed to secure our border, those laws already exist.

 

[Antares]

Thanks for the civics lesson. Have a great day.

 

[HingleMcCringleberry]

Thanks for the civics lesson. Have a great day.

No problem. Anything i can do to break the mind control of Rachel Maddow and Anderson Cooper.

 

[ThorM465]

Umm, did home boy not help kill the border bill because the immigration issue was central to his campaign?

Uhhh, no he did not help kill the WWIII funding bill. This is pure propaganda.

 

[Antares]

I’m not trying to get your panties bunched up. I literally thought he encouraged republicans to vote it down. I guess I’ve got some reading to do.

 

[HingleMcCringleberry]

I’m not trying to get your panties bunched up. I literally thought he encouraged republicans to vote it down. I guess I’ve got some reading to do.

I get you had a tough week. But perhaps you should educate yourself as to why it didn't pass (Hint, it wasn't going to secure the border).

 

[magtech]

Why is it when i take a crap on a thread it gets me a temp ban.

But here you are, not even talking about how we can get silencers deregulated.

If i wanted to hear nonsense about border bill politics id consult the view.

 

[amassi]

Considering its the government, I wouldn't be surprised if the dollars in don't even cover the costs to run the department.

Bingo
Firearms don’t even sniff the revenue that BATFE receives from alcohol or tobacco


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[amassi]

I doubt things in CA will change anytime soon but the amount of red that appeared during the election this year was impressive. Hopefully you guys can keep moving in that direction.
View attachment 787926

That 2024 map sure looks like it’s time to split Californias electoral college votes up by district.

The hill we need to climb is only getting taller. Republicans are moving out of state and democrats keep throwing out feel good freebies to appease their base.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[fngTony]

Less 24cf and more Rokslide please

 

[arlenter]

Please enlighten us on what that "border bill" would have done?

Sure -

We have an asylum problem in the US, not an illegal crossing problem.
Immigrants can come in and claim asylum. Since our system is so backed up with these claims... PER our current LAW - we have to let them in the country first, and give them a slip to return for their court date to hear their asylum claim to see if it's legitimate or not. Many, once they are in the country, never return for their court date, and stay illegally. Even if most do return for their court dates, waiting times can be backed up for a year or more. Meanwhile more people keep coming in.

We can't get around this process - it's literally the law... but what the bill would have done is.

1. provide substantial funding to hirer more judges, and more border patrol agents to process these claims faster. So they could INSTANTLY process their asylum claim as legitimate or not, and either legally let them in, or deny them and send them back.

2. passed a new law to allow us to completely/instantly shut down the border if immigrant entries reach 5,000/day. A power that we currently do not have. The border would be completely shut down - no matter who was trying to get in.

 

[Reburn]

Sure -

We have an asylum problem in the US, not an illegal crossing problem.
Immigrants can come in and claim asylum. Since our system is so backed up with these claims... PER our current LAW - we have to let them in the country first, and give them a slip to return for their court date to hear their asylum claim to see if it's legitimate or not. Many, once they are in the country, never return for their court date, and stay illegally. Even if most do return for their court dates, waiting times can be backed up for a year or more. Meanwhile more people keep coming in.

We can't get around this process - it's literally the law... but what the bill would have done is.

1. provide substantial funding to hirer more judges, and more border patrol agents to process these claims faster. So they could INSTANTLY process their asylum claim as legitimate or not, and either legally let them in, or deny them and send them back.

2. passed a new law to allow us to completely/instantly shut down the border if immigrant entries reach 5,000/day. A power that we currently do not have. The border would be completely shut down - no matter who was trying to get in.

What does this have to do with suppressors? The topic of the thread.