Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Robby, just seems like it's easier to find 7mm build with extended mag lengths than it is on the 270 platform. Especially the basic 270 Win platform, not the WSM per se. Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
Muzzle breaks are awesome get that 300 wsmI have a tikka t3 lite in 300 wsm was a handfull before the break but not bad now.
So another question spurring off my original. If I did go with a mid range gun for now it would likely have an effective accuracy range of 500 at most with factory components. If nothing is ever shot past 400 will you even notice a difference between the 6.5 and 7-08? Seems like most everything I'm encountering on the 6.5 is that it really turns on at much longer distances, but at what point does it gain the upper hand?
Thanks everyone for the responses!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hearing loss is a myth. If it was really going, wouldn't it stand to reason that the ringing in yer ears should get progressively quieter as well??
But it don't...
I'm not forgetting about anything - I shoot the 195's. You said there weren't longer bullets available in .277 which is clearly falseYou forgetting about the .284 195? That 277 doesn't come close to that, and very very few 270 rifles have the mag box length to shoot those 170s loaded long
Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
Also, I will ask a dumb question about the 6.5 creedmore...what are your thoughts about the staying power of the round? As in 5 years from now do you see the bullet selection drying up (unless you reload), like so many other popular calibers over the years.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G891A using Tapatalk
So another question spurring off my original. If I did go with a mid range gun for now it would likely have an effective accuracy range of 500 at most with factory components. If nothing is ever shot past 400 will you even notice a difference between the 6.5 and 7-08? Seems like most everything I'm encountering on the 6.5 is that it really turns on at much longer distances, but at what point does it gain the upper hand?
Thanks everyone for the responses!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That's sound logic right there![]()
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G891A using Tapatalk
I misspoke obviously, but thank God you're here to correct me. Carry onI'm not forgetting about anything - I shoot the 195's. You said there weren't longer bullets available in .277 which is clearly false
Shooters and competitors shoot vastly more ammo per year than strictly hunters. The reason those "popular calibers" failed is because they were and are marketed to hunters first. The hunting community does not shoot that much. The Creedmoor was specifically designed for shooters and competitors first, and also hunters. It just so happens that what's good for field style rifle competitions (sniper matches) is also good for most big game hunting. It's hard to explain to hunters how much factory Creedmoor ammo is shot per year.
It will be here for as long as metallic cartridges are used.
Yes. A better to look at it is this-
take all the time, money, effort, research, and range trips that you would spend on reloading and working a load up for whatever cartridge you want... and instead go to any decent gun shop and buy $25 box ammo that is national match winning accurate in 6.5 Creed and then spend all the extra time that you have on your wife, kids, scouting, whatever. Everything that people do with reloading the Creedmoor is designed to address with factory ammo.
The Creedmoor was designed to-
1) Have factory guns and inexpensive factory ammo that is consistently accurate enough to win national matches.
2) Offer 260rem performance in a case that is designed correctly to fit long, high BC billets in standard shaft action mag boxes.
3) Throats and mag boxes fit correctly the COAL.
4) Offer ridiculously good ammo for both competition and hunting for around $20-$25 a box.
5) Offer extremely good external ballistic and terminal ballistic performance in a low recoiling round.
I thought that's what a 308 was supposed to do??