- Joined
- Oct 22, 2014
- Messages
- 9,908
Actually pretty impressed with the results on this one. Any reason to suspect a newer model FF would perform similarly?
Do not look like "Seekins/Vortex PMR" mounts to me, am I wrong?
Thanks for posting, Form. I've always wondered how the FF would do in the drop test. Would Warne Mountain Techs be a good solution for 1" tubed scope as well?
Curious If the scope had shifted outside of the orange circle, but maintained a similar size group as the base? For instance, starting the 10 shot group was 1.5" after the first drop it then shifted right 2", but then held a 1.5" group for all drops/shot afterwards. I have an older scope that did exactly that with the drop test. I have some results I will post once I get through a few more test.
What would be your thoughts on that scope "passing".
Is that a waxed Armageddon gamechanger with a S2H patch or a waxed molinator?
Upside down so it was hard to tell if it had the molinator ridges on it or was flat like a GC. Excited to hear about the rear bagWaxed Molinator. It’s solid. Also a new rear bag that is just about perfect for variable field shooting.
I also would like to know if newer Burris hold up, seeing as your old Leupold passed but new models did not. Perhaps they just don't make things like they used to...?
Essentially the same.just to further derail the thread - how different is the mollinator from the pint sized gamechanger?
just to further derail the thread - how different is the mollinator from the pint sized gamechanger?
What happened to the bolt shroud on that gun?