- Joined
- Oct 22, 2014
- Messages
- 10,108
This seems like it is devolving into the typical "if you use a guide, you are just a trigger puller" internet diatribes.
Is it a rant? Or is it a discussion about a video that was posted?
In any case- no, the moment you pay someone to do your work, it is not “your” doing. There is a different between “required by law, but I did everything I possibly could”; and “I paid someone to know the area, know the animals, carry most of the weight, lead me to the animal, I shot it, the guide recovered it, butchered it, and carried most of the weight”.
Yes, there are lots of areas in between. The video shows something that resembles the latter, not the former.
There is a lot that happens before and after the trigger is pulled on any hunt, and trying to define a hunt based on unfounded assumptions about a singular aspect of it seems pointless.
And where do you draw the line? Is it "your hunt" if your hunting partner glasses up an animal you shoot? Tracks and locates an animal you killed before you do? Helps pack out an animal you shot? Holds a leg while you are skinning? I've done all that for guys I have hunted with and never once thought that stopped it from being their hunt or that they shouldn't be shooting animals as a result.
You are using strawmen and logical fallacies. We are not discussing hunting with your partner. We are discussing what is presented in a video that was pushed out for media, about a guy who shot an animal and then let other people- including someone that wasn’t the guide, go to retrieve that animal while the shooter went back to camp.