Athlon Rangecraft Chronograph at S&S Archery

[BBob]

Who has been able to update software? I keep seeing random posts of say .62 on up to the .64 version where mine is on the original .61 and continuously says no updates available.

Updated to .69 this evening.

 

[DB29]

Updated to .69 this evening.
View attachment 899216

I downloaded it and it deleted 1 of my bullet profiles, deleted the notes I had in the 2 other bullet profiles and duplicated a couple of the saved range sessions I had. I will get out this weekend and shoot to see if it is giving different speeds.

 

[coacht84]

I know this isn't exactly a review thread, but I don't see a better place to post because the only other thread is specific to reloading and I've only used the Rangecraft for archery. IDK if I should have started a new thread...

Overall, I am a little disappointed/frustrated, but hopefully and optimistic that issues will be resolved eventually. I have zero experience with chronographs. I bought this to use for archery (mostly curiosity on FPS) and primarily for muzzleloader load development. I have only used it for archery so far. Hoping to try it with muzzleloaders this weekend.

First impression was very positive. Screen is bright, button design and menu layout is easy to use, and it has picked up every arrow I have shot over it. I first shot in my garage and the speed was very much in range of my expectations. In 10 shots, there were no outliers on results. Everything looked great and I thought I was golden.

The next day I took it to a very large indoor range. My buddy wanted to chronograph his bow. The readings were about 10-15 fps faster than I expected. He was super pumped, but I knew something was fishy. I grabbed my bow and shot over it. It was reading about 15 fps faster than it did the night before. I tried positioning the Rangecraft in a bunch of different places and more/less had the same results.

The only difference I could identify between the 2 shooting sessions was the size of the space I was shooting in. My garage was pretty confined, shooting with my freezers on one side and storage shelves/totes on the other and a 9 ft ceiling it was like shooting in a hallway. The range is in a huge steel building, 60 yards long, 30 yards wide, and probably 30+ ft ceiling. I had a theory that the radar waves were acting different in the confined space.

Next I asked the pro shop at the range to shoot in their little shooting booth and use their Garmin chrono. Magically, when I went to the confined space of the booth, the Rangecraft was reading the same as it had in my garage. I think my theory has some legs. Also, interesting to note that I was not at all impressed with the Garmin chrono. It wouldn't read the first shot of any session, and it missed another couple. The Rangecraft hasn't missed any since I've gotten it. The Garmin read about 6 fps faster than the Rangecraft (no way to know which is more accurate), but it's standard deviation was much higher than the Rangecraft. It's a small sample size I know and I didn't take a photo after I had a higher shot count, but I thought the Garmin kind of sucked. I didn't even mention the crappier screen brightness, worse button design, and menu layout that was much less user friendly IMHO.

I have been hopeful that a firmware update will improve the archery functionality in the Rangecraft, but I can't get the damn thing to install. It stalls at 50% progress repeatedly. Hopefully that gets remedied soon too.

 

[thinhorn_AK]

I’m glad they didn’t copy Garmin on the price. Idk why competition for Garmin gets people excited.

Because people who bought the garmin don’t want to believe there is something as good for ~ 60% of the cost. I have a garmin but I’m not mad about this.