Nope not me making the comparisons, I am only defending my birthright, which, besides the fact the Feds bought our land and didn't need it to be given to us, the differences are minor. Now the one thing that scars me about alot of the private land ownership here is that it is high fenced, which I am surprised no one has brought up in their antagonism towards Texas. So there, I've stole your thunder. But again, not me bro, hands up don't shoot. Here are just a few examples of when Texas was brought up every time this situation hits the interwebs.
http://www.rokslide.com/forums/show...-to-Transfer-Federal-Land-to-the-States/page2
http://www.rokslide.com/forums/showthread.php?41124-Ted-Cruz/page14
http://www.rokslide.com/forums/general-discussion-forum/34249-republicans-stances-land-transfer.html
http://www.rokslide.com/forums/showthread.php?41124-Ted-Cruz/page11
http://www.rokslide.com/forums/general-discussion-forum/38542-executive-action-12.html
http://www.rokslide.com/forums/gene...ively-bowhunters-vs-rifle-hunters-lend-2.html
It should be brought up because it's the biggest example of what public land sportsman or recreationalist don't want the west to turn into, don't understand the big deal. No one besides rich money bags want land and hunting to be privatized so no one can afford to hunt except for themselves.