- Joined
- Dec 20, 2019
- Messages
- 1,138
OL did its job. This thread is evidence. Journalism, and I use that word loosely, used to serve the purpose of information or entertainment. The goal of journalism today is to incite.
Those comparisons drive me nuts......It’s like when anyone (Especially Ron Spomer) posts 6.5 vs 308, 308 vs 30-06, 270 vs 30-06, all clickbait anymore. Just driving traffic for more money.
Yes I am so easily offended using .224, .264, .284 and .308 and killing deer. I’m not picky. Like I said, shot placement and physics.I read the article and I'm not sure what your issue with it is, are you an easily offended 6.5 guy??
They acknowledged all the variables that lead to quick kills and good vs poor blood trails.
Most importantly they accurately described what happens when you shoot an animal in the shoulder with an explosive small caliber bullet (143 eldx and 142 ablr).
I've been hunting with a 6.5 for 5 years and taken a lot of animals with it, there is definitely some truth to the arguments being made for larger calibers like an 06 knocking game down quicker, and a bigger hole will allow more fluids to escape than a smaller hole with equalshot placement, its physics..
Personally I've seen more shit go sideways with 243s than anything else..
This season I shot a bull at 300 yards at a very steep downward angle, I was on a cliff above and shot down into rear lungs quartering away. The 220 grain Berger passed through the top of one lung and penetrated all the way to the chest and lodged under the skin.
He tore into the brush and timber like only an elk can do, I searched around and surprisingly found a decent blood trail that turned into a 50' blood luge where he went down and skidded through the brush on a steep slope.
That one lung was shredded from the large diameter expanded bullet.
Now please make your case that a 140 class 6.5 creed woulda inflicted the same level of damage, penetration, and blood letting as a 220 grain mushroom.
I read the article and I'm not sure what your issue with it is, are you an easily offended 6.5 guy??
They acknowledged all the variables that lead to quick kills and good vs poor blood trails.
Most importantly they accurately described what happens when you shoot an animal in the shoulder with an explosive small caliber bullet (143 eldx and 142 ablr).
I've been hunting with a 6.5 for 5 years and taken a lot of animals with it,
there is definitely some truth to the arguments being made for larger calibers like an 06 knocking game down quicker, and a bigger hole will allow more fluids to escape than a smaller hole with equalshot placement, its physics..
Personally I've seen more shit go sideways with 243s than anything else..
This season I shot a bull at 300 yards at a very steep downward angle, I was on a cliff above and shot down into rear lungs quartering away. The 220 grain Berger passed through the top of one lung and penetrated all the way to the chest and lodged under the skin.
He tore into the brush and timber like only an elk can do, I searched around and surprisingly found a decent blood trail that turned into a 50' blood luge where he went down and skidded through the brush on a steep slope.
That one lung was shredded from the large diameter expanded bullet.
Now please make your case that a 140 class 6.5 creed woulda inflicted the same level of damage, penetration, and blood letting as a 220 grain mushroom.
113 grains so just over 50% which is what I prefer since most of my kills are beyond 500.How much does it weigh now? Just wondering what the retention was.
Why the Fack do they have to call out a specific cartridge for that? I mean the article might have good points but it could apply to many cartridges. F ing media has to splash a catchy headline to write basic crap. Ridiculous.
Can you please point out one real person like that? This is stated constantly and yet I have never seen a single person say or act that way.Turn about fair play for the 6.5 Creed fanboys that think it’s the greatest cartridge ever invented?
Can you please point out one real person like that? This is stated constantly and yet I have never seen a single person say or act that way.
They spent the first half of the article poo-pooing the 6.5 Creed, then the second half telling us why the first half should be taken with a grain of salt.The article finally gets to reasonable points towards the end. They just used the 6.5 Creedmoor slight to get everyone to click on it. “Not getting good blood trails? Here’s why.” No mention of caliber needed. But who can be quick to argue over that?
You'll have to trust me on this one. There are people out there who fanatically worship the 6.5 Creedjesus.Can you please point out one real person like that? This is stated constantly and yet I have never seen a single person say or act that way.
click bait... mention the most loved/hated cartridge ever made in the article titleWhy the Fack do they have to call out a specific cartridge for that? I mean the article might have good points but it could apply to many cartridges. F ing media has to splash a catchy headline to write basic crap. Ridiculous.
i just sold my 7RM to fund a chassis for my gender bender (6.5creed)Damn, I forgot the .277 to add to my list of calibers that I’m so easily offended with. I always forget about the 270 mini-gay that I have.
Some guys think the 6.5Jesus is the best. Not me, I know better. It’s the 260 Rem . If I were to stack the deer in a pickup bed I’ve killed over the last 20 years with a.264 flavor I’d easily have 3 beds heaped. It’s certainly not the best but stuff dies when hit in the right spot. My 7RM is lonely sitting by itself in the dark all these years.