That’s a tired refrain from jealous or ignorant people who obviously don’t have an open enough mind to do the math of how many tags are sold annually for each big game species, and the dollars those tags generate.
If you have a better way to raise that kind of money that goes directly back to the sheep, then let everyone know. You or someone else paying your $3000 fee for the tag you draw doesn’t do squat by comparison. Hard to get past your emotions to think logically I’m sure, but thats the truth. A state adding a single tag for this purpose does not take a tag away from blue collar Billy no matter how much you want that to be the case.
Did you even read the second sentence of my post?
How could I have said it any clearer that the $1.3 Million tag was "Great for conservation!"
I know that the money raised from those tags goes back to the state and to FNAWS for sheep management, and I also know that those "Governor" tags don't affect the number of tags that are available to the hunting public in the drawings. I'm 100% in favor of those tags.
And in the second part of my second sentence, I just said that I and many other hunters don't have the $1.3 Million to be able to bid on that tag. I also don't have $70,000 plus for a Stone sheep tag that I couldn't afford for $11,000 25 years ago'
Also, where did you come up with "your $3000 fee for the tag you draw [that] doesn’t do squat by comparison." I don't apply for tags outside of my home state of Montana, and if I would be lucky enough to draw a Montana sheep tag would cost me a whopping $125, which really doesn't do squat compared to that NM $1.3 million tag.
And as for your " holier than thou" comment of "Hard to get past your emotions to think logically I’m sure, but thats the truth." Maybe you should look into a mirror before you write such slander.
But long as you mentioned "the truth", the cost of the Montana bighorn ram tags back when I shot my 3 rams was $25 each.