6.5 creed magnum

My main takeaway from this thread is that most Roksliders never took Physics 101.
Unfortunately people having taken intro classes (like 10+ years ago) is a problem too.

"It's basic geometry!" - People saying higher scope mounts noticeably increase the affects of scope cant (it's not geometry at all)

"Drop-test's sample size is too low!" - People who took Intro to Statistics and don't know how anything works

"Equal and opposite reaction!" - People who took Physics 101 and don't understand how this stuff works either
 
My main takeaway from this thread is that most Roksliders never took Physics 101.
My favorite part of PH101 was trajectory and figuring out why uphill/downhill shots have different shoot to distances even though you have a correct line of sight distance.

301 was kind of out in the weeds for me when it came to acoustic physics but it did show me about how gun shots travel through materials and really made me carry earplugs as an EDC item.

Jay
 
Again with the lack of reading comprehension and misstating what I said. Nowhere did I say that those energies are a requirement but you continueto do that because you cant counter the informationwith fact. Those are the well known recommended energies by multiple sources. You have yet to produce any for the contrary. If what you're doing works stick with it, but in my opinion your living in a very small operational windows with those choices. Why restrict yourself to shorter ranges and limited shot angles when there are more capable options?
OK...bullet construction. Ready GO!
 
Back
Top