6.5 CM 2000-2500 rounds, same source puts 308 at 5000-8000 rounds. https://dmr-llc.com/?p=246
Can't find a reliable'ish source for 7-08, but guess it will fall between the two.
Surprisingly, while very minimal, the 7-08 using Hornady Precision Hunter has a MPBR of 320 meters using the criteria outlined earlier, so it can ballistically outperform a 6.5 CM. Though, 10 meters is to small for me to call it a clear advantage.
Continuing to use Hornady Precision Hunter and assuming factory spec MV.
If minimum expansion velocity is 1800, the 7-08 has an effective range of 640 meters with dialing 3.8 mil. The 6.5 CM of 570 meters with dialing 3.2 mil, and the 308 of 510 meters with dialing 2.7 mil, pretty clear the 308 is bottom of that pile.
At 510 meters the 6.5 dials 2.4 mil and the 7-08 dials 2.2 mil.
Pretty clear that ballistically the 7-08 wins, at least using the assumptions of these figures.
6.5 CM gives 15.32 ft.lb recoil.
7-08 gives 16.9.
308 gives 18.4
Powder charge was estimated using Vihatavuori load data for calculating recoil.
Can't find a reliable'ish source for 7-08, but guess it will fall between the two.
Surprisingly, while very minimal, the 7-08 using Hornady Precision Hunter has a MPBR of 320 meters using the criteria outlined earlier, so it can ballistically outperform a 6.5 CM. Though, 10 meters is to small for me to call it a clear advantage.
Continuing to use Hornady Precision Hunter and assuming factory spec MV.
If minimum expansion velocity is 1800, the 7-08 has an effective range of 640 meters with dialing 3.8 mil. The 6.5 CM of 570 meters with dialing 3.2 mil, and the 308 of 510 meters with dialing 2.7 mil, pretty clear the 308 is bottom of that pile.
At 510 meters the 6.5 dials 2.4 mil and the 7-08 dials 2.2 mil.
Pretty clear that ballistically the 7-08 wins, at least using the assumptions of these figures.
6.5 CM gives 15.32 ft.lb recoil.
7-08 gives 16.9.
308 gives 18.4
Powder charge was estimated using Vihatavuori load data for calculating recoil.