BlackGreyhounds
FNG
Thanks for your for real-world experience/opinionAs someone who owns and has hunted with a 260AI a lot my recommendation is a 6.5 PRC
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks for your for real-world experience/opinionAs someone who owns and has hunted with a 260AI a lot my recommendation is a 6.5 PRC
Can you expand on that?
I get the hassle with 260AI about fire forming, wildcat dies, and throating long to make use of longer bullets.
But once that is all accounted for, is it there something about the cartridge comparison I should know?
Like if 260AI were a factory option is there still a big argument for 6.5 PRC?
There is a good amount of info out there, not sure of a single good source though. Personally I just bought some 1x fired stuff, did my normal brass prep and annealing, and sized it to 338 Federal. Then I looked in a bunch of manuals for 338fed loads that weren’t compressed with the projectile I was using, and I loaded up to and well beyond max. Results were great, I definitely found the velocity limit with the lighter projectiles, so I plan on going to heavier ones and seeing how that works. With 260ai I’m going to do the same, but probably just try to maximize velocity with the projectiles I’m already using. If you search around there are people using the hybrid brass for 308 and 8.6blk, and I’m sure others.Would love to read more about 277 brass used for other calibers. Is there a thread or other resources?
Which bullets were used? ThanksI am a big 260 ai fan. We built one for my three boys to start hunting with as a shared rifle. My youngest just wrapped up his first season with it last fall with two pronghorn, a muley buck, and a bull elk.
In three seasons now, that rifle has 19 filled tags under it's belt including a couple bulls just past 500 yards. It is a very efficient and what I'd consider optimized cartridge for western big game.
We built a second one for one of my twins, and last year he killed a black bear, an antelope buck, a bull elk, and a big bodied mule deer.
It's a great cartridge.
All animals in the first 260 ai were killed with a 127 barnes lrx. The second one is using 135 bergers currently, and took the spring bear with an eld m straight 260 fire forming load. But, we had planned to swap that over to the lrx as well.Which bullets were used? Thanks
Maybe this is a stupid question, where are you finding this reloading data?The other thing that may be worth considering is a 6.5x55 Tikka. With readily available Lapua brass and SKAN reloading data, they get up and go.
Maybe this is a stupid question, where are you finding this reloading data?
Dad had a 6.5x55 tikka that I have been eyeballing, I haven’t seen any “hot” data for it but maybe I have been looking in the wrong place. For example the hornady app/data says it is slower than the 6.5 creedmoor.
It is the next logical step up from the Creedmoor, they got a lot right with the design of those two rounds.Can you expand on that?
I get the hassle with 260AI about fire forming, wildcat dies, and throating long to make use of longer bullets.
But once that is all accounted for, is it there something about the cartridge comparison I should know?
Like if 260AI were a factory option is there still a big argument for 6.5 PRC?
Handgun hunter provided the best link to SKAN data. Some of the older reloading manuals also have good data, but you’ve got to be careful with those as propellants have changed formulas in the ensuing decades while retaining the same names in some (or most) instances.Maybe this is a stupid question, where are you finding this reloading data?
Dad had a 6.5x55 tikka that I have been eyeballing, I haven’t seen any “hot” data for it but maybe I have been looking in the wrong place. For example the hornady app/data says it is slower than the 6.5 creedmoor.
This is a good writeup on the issue: https://chuckhawks.com/case_capacity_matters.htmlMost US 6.5x55 load data is 'lawyered' to lower pressures, supposedly because of old Norwegian Krag actions.
Case capacity will vary by brass (and chamber if you don't full re-size brass) but roughly:
6.5 Swede ~ 58.0 gr. H2O
6.5 Creedmoor ~ 54.0 gr. H2O
So assuming good i.e. Lupua brass and a strong action, the swede has a little more capacity. But in real world, I seem to find a sweet spot below 'max' at essentially at Creed velocities for a given bullet....
My favorite 6.5x55 basic whitetail load is "hot' per some books, but duplicates factory 6.5 Creed and clearly isn't over pressure in my rifles...
I wish I ran viht powders. I don’t have any, but I have pounds and pounds of H1000 and H4350 laying around. Good to know though that if I were to get my grubby paws on that tikka I could throw some lapua brass at it and safely work up to creedmoor velocities and beyond.Handgun hunter provided the best link to SKAN data. Some of the older reloading manuals also have good data, but you’ve got to be careful with those as propellants have changed formulas in the ensuing decades while retaining the same names in some (or most) instances.
My 24” 6.5x55 Husqvarna 1640 is running over 2900fps with 140gr Sierras and no signs of pressure. As notoriously unreliable as pressure signs are, these are almost certainly over the 55ksi limit established even for the hot SKAN/SE loads. I’m quite comfortable running above that using top quality brass in an action designed for 62ksi belted mag loads, but those loads don’t go in my old small ring Mausers. They stay closer to 2700fps.
I’d love to fool with one in a Tikka with a threaded barrel. It’s really optimized for the tikka action length and running 140-147s long.