30-30 Copper ammo (Barnes) penciled through Whitetail Buck this morning...thoughts?

sniper20

FNG
Joined
Aug 8, 2024
Messages
12
Location
South Dakota
I tried Barnes TSX in a 6.5 Creedmoor once... once. Shot a smaller buck about 120yds out, perfect behind the shoulder shot. Zero expansion, bullet was recovered and it was still 100% intact. The petals on the nose were actually bent inward, making it more of a FMJ.

Barnes, along with every other "traditional" mono are built great, but need more velocity for expansion. The 30-30 just isn't the best cartridge to offer that. I know Maker and supposedly Hornady Mono offers better expansion at lower velocity, but I haven't used those. I have used Cavity Back Bullets for 6.5 Grendel and they give really good expansion at lower velocity, but they are too long to load into 30-30 (I tried with some 300BO bullets, not a fun jam to try and clear...)

If you are REQUIRED to use Mono, I would say there might be better options as Barnes hasn't/won't change their stuff. But the 30-30 was designed as a black powder cartridge, thus using soft lead and lower velocity. I shoot factory Winchester stuff in mine, but don't use the 30-30 much.

All that being said, I recovered my deer to see the bullet didn't perform. So doesn't that mean it DID perform???

Everyone expects bullets to make wound channels like they see in gel tests. I do homemade gel testing, and the bullets perform "perfect" as they show on the boxes they come in. However, bullets I have recovered from animals rarely look the same... Way too many variables to say the "perfect" bullet for X situation.

If our forefathers used FMJ surplus ammo from the wars in 30-06 ammo, harvested more deer than we do today... obviously shot placement is more important than expansion. Just my .02
 
Top