.25 Cal (Quarter Bore) / Big Game Success - 25 Creed, 25-284, 25-06, 25 PRC, 25 SAUM

Bull elk, 25 creedmoor 580 yards for 2050fps impact

Not very good pictures, not very good shot placement, but I was happy with the performance.

One high lungs behind shoulder, recovered jacket under offside hide/in muscle tissue. Entrance not pictured but roughly 2.5” hole through the ribs.



A follow up shot: through the “knuckle” of front shoulder. Lots of damage, made it into the chest cavity. Was solo and tired and did not dissect to see how the internal damage was. There was a little bit of bloodshot on the opposite side shoulder but didn’t see much damage against offside rib cage.
What bullet Will?
 
Whoops. 134 ELDM.

Second elk with these bullets, they are performing as hoped/expected.

Not loving the recoil of my unbraked 25 creed tho. Got used to the 22cm which is a noticable stepdown..
Nice on bullet selection. I will be testing these in my creed this year also if the wife doesn't try to steal it again. Ran the Berger 135s last year without issue so expecting similar from the 134s.
 
25-06: Hornady 117 gr SST

61695ae6e1212c754a350f41eebfd85c.jpg


a3250d5e33c48ec40b7038bdbe492973.jpg


e230c2fd0259300486a54b03860dcde1.jpg
 
Nice on bullet selection. I will be testing these in my creed this year also if the wife doesn't try to steal it again. Ran the Berger 135s last year without issue so expecting similar from the 134s.
I killed around a dozen animals with the 135s and they did fine. I really like the wound channel on the 134s..prefer the rapid expansion of the 134s to the longer neck length on the 135s mostly because I’m a deer hunter and sometimes a 4” neck length means you are only smashing one lung instead of two. And with a small sample size of two elk, I’d say the 134s are working just fine there. On deer they’ve been excellent, although I have not documented the destruction it’s been 5 or 6 with great results.
 
I killed around a dozen animals with the 135s and they did fine. I really like the wound channel on the 134s..prefer the rapid expansion of the 134s to the longer neck length on the 135s mostly because I’m a deer hunter and sometimes a 4” neck length means you are only smashing one lung instead of two. And with a small sample size of two elk, I’d say the 134s are working just fine there. On deer they’ve been excellent, although I have not documented the destruction it’s been 5 or 6 with great results.
Valid point as usual Will. Appreciate the feedback
 
That must be a pretty warm load for sure, and what powder and COAL are you running? Berger's load data with a 26" barrel has N570 at 3142, Retumbo at 3103, and RE-33 at 3127, all well over 100% case fill with the 135 @ 3.25".

If you can get that MV safely in a 24", that would be awesome.

It is a spicey load. As with all load data this works in my rifle, work up on your rifle as this load may be to hot for your rifle. I am running 62.8 grs of Retumbo with the 133 Bergers EH at .025 OTL, 3,250 FPS at 832ft. Remember it is an Ackley so the case capacity is greater than a ruin of the mill 25-06. At 7,500ft where I was hunting it was faster and carries more than 2,000fps to well over 1,000 yards.

Here is the entrance wound;

Mule Deer.jpeg

I would not hesitate to use this round on an Elk. Although I did shoot my Elk with a 7PRC using the Berger 175EH which had incredible results.
 
+1 for the 25 prc.

133 gr @ 3090 fps.

430 yards. Smedium muley buck.

He fell just off camera.

Looked like I hit a click high, but centered up both lungs. Entry top of the cavity (small). Exit center (1.5" or so)

Damage wasn't quite as devastating as ive seen other hunting bergers. But definitely adequate. Nothing hard was hit. Also was surprised to not hear the thump of the bullet hit at that distance.

 

Attachments

  • 20251031_085456.jpg
    20251031_085456.jpg
    487.8 KB · Views: 11
  • 20251031_090438.jpg
    20251031_090438.jpg
    289.5 KB · Views: 10
  • 20251031_092253.jpg
    20251031_092253.jpg
    374.5 KB · Views: 10
  • 20251031_092254.jpg
    20251031_092254.jpg
    229 KB · Views: 10
  • 20251031_092308.jpg
    20251031_092308.jpg
    206.6 KB · Views: 11
  • 20251031_075425.jpg
    20251031_075425.jpg
    599.5 KB · Views: 11
Back
Top