.223 for bear, mountain goat, deer, elk, and moose.

A guy with a 300 can use a 223 to get a lot of trigger time. They have similar trajectories at the ranges I would shoot. The skills are transferrable.

Yea, I plan to largely hunt with my 6mm but do 95% of my training with 223.

Though this year I brought both my 6.5 and 223 to deer camp intending to hunt with it and ended up just hunting with the 223 since I was so comfortable with it. But either wouldve been fine.
 
A guy with a 300 can use a 223 to get a lot of trigger time. They have similar trajectories at the ranges I would shoot. The skills are transferrable.
I fully believe that shooting is a perishable skill. I know I was a whole bunch better with a rifle as a teenager shooting 1000-1500 pellets a week than I am now. I know I was better offhand when I shot a couple hundred rounds of small bore silhouette a week in my 20’s.

I also know that my 264/280AI/7wsm/300wm/300RUM etc etc etc all behave differently under recoil while executing a shot for me than my various 22 centerfires do. And I know that I can call my shots better with my 8lb m700 223AI than I can with my 6.8lb Montana 223AI, even though they shoot the same bullet at the same velocity.

Trigger time is transferable, yes, but I don’t think it’s on a 1:1 ratio.
 
You own more than one rifle, right? I have a T3x in 223 that is my kick around gun and I shoot it a lot. Oddly enough, it loves American Eagle 55gr FMJs, so it’s a cheap date. I let the wife and kids shoot it. It’s the perfect understudy rifle for my other T3x rifles that I hunt with.
You are absolutely correct. The largest bore diameter is the 375H&H. The one with the most recoil is the 7mm RUM.

You probably have a stronger mental capacity than I do. I tend to personally be more consistent and reliable with my 223 and 22 ARC. (I am putting together a 6CM for certain states.) For me and my taste, I like the 22 flavor the best.

Then again, that is why restaurants have menues.... we all get to pick the flavor we like.

I believe the purpose of this thread was to show people another flavor that is available... that might not be the most macho flavor... like a pina cola da! Nothing wrong with that... and getting caught in the rain!
 
Not everyone with a 223 shoots a ton and some guys might shoot a 30-06 a shit load. But on average….

I shot my first .223 more on the first range trip than I've shot my .338 in all of 2025.

Shooting a .223 with a can is fun and reasonably affordable. Time and money are the only constraints. Shooting a bare muzzle .338 50+ rounds in a morning gets not fun and very expensive by the time its over.

So while ill continue to hunt with my big gun because I like it, I learned that my Shooting has degraded over the past 5ish years. I had forgotten how nice it was to be able to shoot at less than 3-5 bucks a pull.
 
I fully believe that shooting is a perishable skill. I know I was a whole bunch better with a rifle as a teenager shooting 1000-1500 pellets a week than I am now. I know I was better offhand when I shot a couple hundred rounds of small bore silhouette a week in my 20’s.

I also know that my 264/280AI/7wsm/300wm/300RUM etc etc etc all behave differently under recoil while executing a shot for me than my various 22 centerfires do. And I know that I can call my shots better with my 8lb m700 223AI than I can with my 6.8lb Montana 223AI, even though they shoot the same bullet at the same velocity.

Trigger time is transferable, yes, but I don’t think it’s on a 1:1 ratio.

You make a good point. The mechanics are transferrable, but other factors are not. I believe recoil tolerance is as perishable as basic marksmanship.
 
Baby boy or girl? My first was a girl and she loves to go out in the woods with me. She’s also a heck of a fisherman.
I have been blessed with 2 girls. That is what started the 223 journey for me. What what a low recoil with high conviction bullet that I could get her hunting the soonest with me. My oldest is now 5. She has not hunted deer or hogs yet as I am not confident with her consistentcy yet. She is, however, my dedicated rooster shooter when we need to thin the flock! She is also my racoon/fox dispatcher when we trap them!

She also like to kayak fish with me and run noodle lines (the kind with a pool noodle... not the kind where you put your arm in thier mouth!)
 
Can we get back to the bullets? Why wouldn’t my 178 eld-x do significantly more damage than my 77tmk on elk? I shoot both equally well. (Braked .30)

Holding both in my hand, i don’t see why I wouldnt choose the eldx every time for elk.

Anybody with extensive experience with this bullet?
 
Can we get back to the bullets? Why wouldn’t my 178 eld-x do significantly more damage than my 77tmk on elk? I shoot both equally well. (Braked .30)

Holding both in my hand, i don’t see why I wouldnt choose the eldx every time for elk.

Anybody with extensive experience with this bullet?
I agree. The 178gr is going to do significant damage! I do not have personal experience with this particular grain bullet. I love the eldx as a rounded statement.

The question might be... "How much damage are you willing to accept? And How far out do you need that bullet to do that much damage?

The 800 yard elk kill with a 223 is not one I would use as a metric. IIRC, the shooter knew that the distance to the elk had the bullet well below the effective velocity to give the beautiful terminal performance you see in this threads pictures. The shooter had a 2nd mag set up ready thank for a quick reload. The 800 yard elk recieved 7 shots in very rapid order. I am certainties the 1st would ha e done him in after a few hours but they wanted it down there and fed it a few more rounds. (This was not a "hunting" situation.)

If you want to hunt at 800 yards. You have the bullet/cartridge in your hand!

If you are hunting under 400 yards and the 77gr TMK is already doing this much damage, why do more (unnecessary?) damage and deal with more (unnecessary?) recoil if you do not need to?
 
I finally get my message typed out with 1 thumb as I am holding a baby in the other ar. Trying to get her down... once I hip post, 2 people have already said what I was trying to say more direct and simplistic.... I am slow.

I am also a fisher and a hunter and like to tell stories...

I feel your pain. I’m rocking mine to sleep for the second time tonight right now. There’s been several instances reading here the past few months I’ve delayed bedtime from laughing out loud.
 
How have the blood trails been (assuming you've needed at least one)?
All 5 were shot with 73 eldm between 100 and 225 yards. 3 dropped, and 1 stumbled for a second before I put a second in the neck. 1 ran about 75 yards with a lung hit, the blood trail wasn't crazy but was still there and it was shot in the rain so that affected it. I would recommend the round to anyone.
 
I would trade places with you dads in a hot minute. My youngest is 25, so it’s been a looong time since I had the honor of baby duty.

When it’s over it’s over, brothers, and it don’t come back unless you have another. Savor every moment. You’re gonna blink and it’s graduation day.

My oldest is 8, but she’s already 5’ tall and wears her mom’s shoes. I look at her baby and toddler pictures and sometimes my heart hurts that’s she’s past that.

My son, on the other hand, is a terrorist.
 
I would trade places with you dads in a hot minute. My youngest is 25, so it’s been a looong time since I had the honor of baby duty.

When it’s over it’s over, brothers, and it don’t come back unless you have another. Savor every moment. You’re gonna blink and it’s graduation day.
My youngest is 21 but I'm a brand new grandpa so I'm already dreaming of pink 223's and cricket 22's.
 
I agree. The 178gr is going to do significant damage! I do not have personal experience with this particular grain bullet. I love the eldx as a rounded statement.

The question might be... "How much damage are you willing to accept? And How far out do you need that bullet to do that much damage?

The 800 yard elk kill with a 223 is not one I would use as a metric. IIRC, the shooter knew that the distance to the elk had the bullet well below the effective velocity to give the beautiful terminal performance you see in this threads pictures. The shooter had a 2nd mag set up ready thank for a quick reload. The 800 yard elk recieved 7 shots in very rapid order. I am certainties the 1st would ha e done him in after a few hours but they wanted it down there and fed it a few more rounds. (This was not a "hunting" situation.)

If you want to hunt at 800 yards. You have the bullet/cartridge in your hand!

If you are hunting under 400 yards and the 77gr TMK is already doing this much damage, why do more (unnecessary?) damage and deal with more (unnecessary?) recoil if you do not need to?
The area I hunt regularly has shots above 400. 2024 bull elk I shot was at 425 with a 150gr SST. (Backup rifle). Although I recovered the bull in short order, I wasn’t “impressed” with the wound channel.

I killed a WT point blank with the 77tmk for the first time, and it will be my eastern whitetail rifle going forward. I’m just not convinced with elk. (Yet)

I realize my experience is antidotal.
 
I would trade places with you dads in a hot minute. My youngest is 25, so it’s been a looong time since I had the honor of baby duty.

When it’s over it’s over, brothers, and it don’t come back unless you have another. Savor every moment. You’re gonna blink and it’s graduation day.
Truth! My youngest is 4½, and while being done with diapers, almost done with car seats, etc is really nice, the day is coming when I carry him to bed for the last time. I fear it's already happened with my girls. Photos and videos of them in the 2-5 year old times make me a little misty eyed sometimes.
 
Back
Top