Castle Rock
WKR
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2020
- Messages
- 2,165
Yes , they are the originals
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I assume you are asking if the magazine will fit in the factory standard bottom metal/plastic like the original magazine does. They fit the original bottom metal.Do the waters mags come in the factory Tikka style or just aics? Have not really looked into them
They make both tikka single stack and aics. I have a 6 and 10 round 223 2.6” coal tikka mags and now 2 223 10 round aics 2.6” coal mags. All work awesome. I have multiple thousand rounds through the 223 tikka mags with zero issues. There’s posts in this thread somewhere on them.Do the waters mags come in the factory Tikka style or just aics? Have not really looked into them
So you’re saying they are worth the price tag then? Haha thanks for the info allThey make both tikka single stack and aics. I have a 6 and 10 round 223 2.6” coal tikka mags and now 2 223 10 round aics 2.6” coal mags. All work awesome. I have multiple thousand rounds through the 223 tikka mags with zero issues. There’s posts in this thread somewhere on them.
I think so. Shipping sucks, and 110 is a lot for a magazine but there’s not really another option. I have that much in tikka mags that are not 100%.So you’re saying they are worth the price tag then? Haha thanks for the info all
Too bad someone in the states didn't stock a few of them... say a company in Idaho that pushes tikkas and has a podcast....I think so. Shipping sucks, and 110 is a lot for a magazine but there’s not really another option. I have that much in tikka mags that are not 100%.
I sent my tikka to the Smith to get rechambered to a 223 ai, I did some more research and decided to leave it as a standard 223 due to ease and didn't think 100 fps would be worth it when the 22 arc is in my opinion better in ever aspect without having to deal with fire forming and feeding issues.So, 223AI... Is the juice worth the squeeze or better to just step up to a 22 ARC or 22CM if you want to send bullets bigger than 77tmk? I've got a CZ in 6.5 Grendel that I couldn't get below 1.5" which was not my experience with the Howa Mini Action 6.5 Grendel rifles I got for my kids. That rifle would be a good candidate for a new barrel in 22 ARC. The velocity I've seen claimed from guys shooting the 88 ELDM in both hand loads and factory rounds has me intrigued.
Jay
So, 223AI... Is the juice worth the squeeze or better to just step up to a 22 ARC or 22CM if you want to send bullets bigger than 77tmk? I've got a CZ in 6.5 Grendel that I couldn't get below 1.5" which was not my experience with the Howa Mini Action 6.5 Grendel rifles I got for my kids. That rifle would be a good candidate for a new barrel in 22 ARC. The velocity I've seen claimed from guys shooting the 88 ELDM in both hand loads and factory rounds has me intrigued.
Jay
Nothing wrong with a 223 with heavier bullets. You just want more barrel, faster twist, more freebore, and more mag space.
I just put together a match gun/trainer that’s sending 85.5 bergers at 2760.
The beauty of the 223 is that it’s cheap!
Hand loading. You won’t find factory ammo with the higher BC bullets because they can’t be made to saami length.Does anyone make anything factory with 80 to 88 grain bullets or are you in handloads only zone? I hope the 223 is easier ro load for than the 22 Hornet cause I lose a lot of those paper thin necks to splits.
Jay
I’ve been loading 223 for years and it’s no where near like trying to baby Hornet brass. I built a 257AI and enjoyed the process quite a bit. That said, I don’t know that I would do that on a 223 platform though since the outcome isnt that different from a regular chamber. If you just want speed and heavies, I’d go with the Arc/Grendel/creed case. If you can live with 70 class bullets at moderate speeds then stick with the 223 IMO.Does anyone make anything factory with 80 to 88 grain bullets or are you in handloads only zone? I hope the 223 is easier ro load for than the 22 Hornet cause I lose a lot of those paper thin necks to splits.
Jay
I went with a new Weatherby Vanguard Obsidian in .223 rem. I thought about making it a .223 AI but we'll see after I shoot it. For my intended purposes a standard .223 bolt rifle should fit the bill for a close to mid range light rifle. My 260 AI will extend past that. For you a 22 ARC in that CZ seems like the obvious solution.So, 223AI... Is the juice worth the squeeze or better to just step up to a 22 ARC or 22CM if you want to send bullets bigger than 77tmk? I've got a CZ in 6.5 Grendel that I couldn't get below 1.5" which was not my experience with the Howa Mini Action 6.5 Grendel rifles I got for my kids. That rifle would be a good candidate for a new barrel in 22 ARC. The velocity I've seen claimed from guys shooting the 88 ELDM in both hand loads and factory rounds has me intrigued.
Jay
So, 223AI... Is the juice worth the squeeze or better to just step up to a 22 ARC or 22CM if you want to send bullets bigger than 77tmk? I've got a CZ in 6.5 Grendel that I couldn't get below 1.5" which was not my experience with the Howa Mini Action 6.5 Grendel rifles I got for my kids. That rifle would be a good candidate for a new barrel in 22 ARC. The velocity I've seen claimed from guys shooting the 88 ELDM in both hand loads and factory rounds has me intrigued.
Jay
The little crow worlds finest trimmer I think its called makes trimming a breeze with a drillIn my experience, the biggest pro for going AI with the .223 is if you reload and hate trimming. The more you shoot/load, the bigger the pro on this.
You get a little speed, but you can get more going other routes. You retain the ability to shoot .223, and in my experience with several .223AI's, standard .223/factory accuracy is great. I've never shot for the purpose of "fireforming" so I've never considered it a hassle. I shoot to shoot, formed brass is just an end product.
In my experience, the biggest con related to AI with the .223 is feeding. After converting all of mine to AICS, it's not an issue. I can't speak to it being an issue with a Tikka as all mine have been Rem based actions.
Summarizing:
1. If you're a dedicated reloader and want the big pro of reduced trimming, AI helps there.
2. Don't AI a chamber unless you're going to use a center feed mag to avoid ratchet'ish feeding.
I've probably had 7 or 8 223ai's over the last 20 years. All have been on r700's. Ive had adl, bdl, and m5 w/aics mags. The aics fed the smoothest but I can't recall ever having issues with any of them off hand. Adl and bdl mag boxes need the spacer cut out and another put in to run longer coal. Never done one on a tikka though.I've been close to going AI a couple times but in the end i shoot too much factory ammo and dont like the idea of possibly rough feeding.
I sent my tikka to the Smith to get rechambered to a 223 ai, I did some more research and decided to leave it as a standard 223 due to ease and didn't think 100 fps would be worth it when the 22 arc is in my opinion better in ever aspect without having to deal with fire forming and feeding issues.
I built a 223ai on a bighorn origin last year and it has pros and cons. Feeding sucks, 150-200fps is awesome…ect.
Best thing is it is super accurate when fire forming. I’ve had a couple 5shot 1/4 min groups with it.
But…I’m considering rebarrel to a vanilla 223 because the new wore off pretty quickly
I've been close to going AI a couple times but in the end i shoot too much factory ammo and dont like the idea of possibly rough feeding.