.223 for bear, mountain goat, deer, elk, and moose.

Tikka's rifles are proofed to the CIP (Long French acronym for Permanent International Commission for the Proof of Small Arms). The CIP max pressure for the .223 Remington is 4300 bar, while the SAAMI max pressure is 3800 bar. The NATO standard for 5.56 is 4300 bar. The U.S. military follows SAAMI pressure guidelines. That's basically a long way of saying that a Tikka .223 barrel is proofed at 5.56 NATO pressures.

Sent from my SM-S918U using Tapatalk

Too much TAC with a 75 ELDM in hot conditions will change the way you look at the world.



P
 
The NATO standard for 5.56 is 4300 bar. The U.S. military follows SAAMI pressure guidelines. That's basically a long way of saying that a Tikka .223 barrel is proofed at 5.56 NATO pressures.

Sent from my SM-S918U using Tapatalk
Is that 4300 bar standard for 5.56 assuming the 5.56 ammo is being fired from a 5.56 chamber with the long sloppy freebore?

Firing the same 5.56 ammo in a standard 223 Remington chamber causes even higher than typical "5.56 pressure" because the bullet can no longer make the easy initial jump to hit the rifling.

This is why chambers with a gradual lead such as 223 Wylde came to be. To try to maintain some of the precision of the 223 chambering without causing the pressure spike.

In this case I have read elsewhere that a Tikka has a chamber similar to a Wylde and it can legitimately use 5.56 ammo without exceeding allowable pressure.

But in general, comparing the stated pressure of 5.56 ammo against the allowable pressure of a 223 rifle is faulty logic because "5.56 pressure" is only true from a 5.56 chamber.

Sorry, soapbox rant complete...

On that, now that Finland became a NATO member 8 months ago, do you think Tikka will begin marking their rifles with "5.56 NATO"?
 
Is that 4300 bar standard for 5.56 assuming the 5.56 ammo is being fired from a 5.56 chamber with the long sloppy freebore?

Firing the same 5.56 ammo in a standard 223 Remington chamber causes even higher than typical "5.56 pressure" because the bullet can no longer make the easy initial jump to hit the rifling.

This is why chambers with a gradual lead such as 223 Wylde came to be. To try to maintain some of the precision of the 223 chambering without causing the pressure spike.

In this case I have read elsewhere that a Tikka has a chamber similar to a Wylde and it can legitimately use 5.56 ammo without exceeding allowable pressure.

But in general, comparing the stated pressure of 5.56 ammo against the allowable pressure of a 223 rifle is faulty logic because "5.56 pressure" is only true from a 5.56 chamber.

Sorry, soapbox rant complete...

On that, now that Finland became a NATO member 8 months ago, do you think Tikka will begin marking their rifles with "5.56 NATO"?
You are correct. I did miss that throat piece. It shouldn't be a factor with factory loads because manufacturers are loading under the max, but I wouldn't take the max load some yahoo on the internet came up with on their 5.56. That'd be unsafe loading practice to begin with, though.

Sent from my SM-S918U using Tapatalk
 
Am I seeing that some guys are shooting the black hill 556 77 gr ammo in their Tikka 223 rifles? If so, any pressure issues? Always read that was a 'no no'.
If anything happens the first thing any manufacturer is going to ask is "What ammo and do you have the case that failed.". Once that is established it's easy to say that 5.56 is not approved for .223 Remington chambers due to chamber pressure.
 
@Pharmseller - If you mentioned it before I missed it; but would you mind telling us how much TAC and what temps caused that? I’m currently using TAC behind a 77SMK at 2720. Haven’t seen any issues on hot days yet, but definitely not looking to find out.
 
Saw 4 more shot with the 73 ELD-M today. Two of them ran a little less than a hundred yards, the others dropped. Internal damage was in line with what I’ve seen consistently this year. Got one exit, which was extremely dramatic. Shots were at 30 yards, 196 yards, 212 yards, and 294 yards. No pics this time.

Edit to add: these were all whitetails.
 
Last edited:
@Pharmseller - If you mentioned it before I missed it; but would you mind telling us how much TAC and what temps caused that? I’m currently using TAC behind a 77SMK at 2720. Haven’t seen any issues on hot days yet, but definitely not looking to find out.

Well, let’s just say it was a lot, like more than Ramshot’s max for 5.56, and it was over 80 F.

Edit to add, it’s the only only only time I’ve exceeded book max.



P
 
No, I wouldn’t use those unless forced. DRT Technology makes a powdered tungsten cored bullet that behaves more like a Berger. The 79gr .224 and 135gr 6.5mm seem to do well.
The 62gr works pretty well for the guys that don't have the twist for the 79. The BC to speed tradeoff actually works in the 62gr's favor past where anyone's shooting an animal with a 223.
 
Data point. Wife’s deer.
223 yards
77 TMK
Impact velocity 2185 fps
Pass through
40 yard run
Right side is entry
c9fb940e322eb6698a64ab086928c0d4.jpg

8a6ce3ca3102548f2141da767fcdda22.jpg

01a4368d27eab1be7cc7f5568e2bb1af.jpg

72a8f90a42b962b52fcb74319f788a88.jpg

267253bd177f43a4b1ba7f1226c1802d.jpg

ce7a6775913115f68c68a96dc8d1a963.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top