.223 for bear, mountain goat, deer, elk, and moose.

@Fartrell Cluggins that looks alot like the places I hunt in Sothwest Georgia. People that hunt out west will say "how can you not follow a blood trail?" I've tracked alot of deer and a good number of those I've been crawling through privet thickets and grown up clear cuts. Pretty places you have there!

I know I am a little late to this convo, but just wanted to add: It’s even more fun when you crawl over a yellow jacket nest. Although you do figure out how the animals travel through that stuff in a hurry. 25 minutes in, 30 seconds out.
 
It's just a Boyd laminate that I took to with a jig-saw. and rasp. Plenty of strength in the laminate and makes a nice light stock.
Any idea how much weight was saved? Or just how heavy it is now? Looks like something I might try.
I found some TMKs and ordered 200. My family has some 223 rifles laying around. Hopefully try the TMKs this spring. I'm still a but hesitant though. Can anyone comment on whether a 6.5 Grendel or 300 Hamr might produce more reliable exits? I'm buying the argument that with a TMK the 223 will kill reliably Just like big blood trails.
 
I know I am a little late to this convo, but just wanted to add: It’s even more fun when you crawl over a yellow jacket nest. Although you do figure out how the animals travel through that stuff in a hurry. 25 minutes in, 30 seconds out.
I've got a video saved that is definitely not appropriate for any forum of me finding a yellow jacket nest with a bush hog. My brother is an ass and laughed the whole time. 😂
 
Any idea how much weight was saved? Or just how heavy it is now? Looks like something I might try.
I found some TMKs and ordered 200. My family has some 223 rifles laying around. Hopefully try the TMKs this spring. I'm still a but hesitant though. Can anyone comment on whether a 6.5 Grendel or 300 Hamr might produce more reliable exits? I'm buying the argument that with a TMK the 223 will kill reliably Just like big blood trails.

Exits are more about bullet choice than head stamp. Monos, bonded bullets, partitions, etc that are built with weight retention as a goal will give exits with enough ooomph and a reasonable shot angle. As mentioned frequently in this thread, there is a tradeoff for the exit hole- you’re shooting a bullet that will do less damage than something like the TMK/ELDMs, unless of course you’re shooting a bigger bullet/pushing it faster etc at the expense of more recoil.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Any idea how much weight was saved? Or just how heavy it is now? Looks like something I might try.
I found some TMKs and ordered 200. My family has some 223 rifles laying around. Hopefully try the TMKs this spring. I'm still a but hesitant though. Can anyone comment on whether a 6.5 Grendel or 300 Hamr might produce more reliable exits? I'm buying the argument that with a TMK the 223 will kill reliably Just like big blood trails.
Understand your concern if you like big blood trails.

That said, I assure you the 77TMK delivers an incredibly lethal wound channel with impact velocities above 1800 fps.
 
Understand your concern if you like big blood trails.

That said, I assure you the 77TMK delivers an incredibly lethal wound channel with impact velocities above 1800 fps.
The big thing that might change my mind would be someone convincing me that a .223 will drop things FASTER to make that blood trail a moot point. But like I said earlier, I will probably try a .223 for spring bear. We don't need a .223 because the kids I take out do just fine with my 308. Between the suppressor and the weight it has extremely minimal recoil. The .223 would really be nice on our fall mountain hunts, which is where the brush is thicker and a good blood trail is nice. So we might try a .223 in the spring where it is a safer experiment. If it goes well I would love to carry an AR15 for our mountain hunts.
 
The big thing that might change my mind would be someone convincing me that a .223 will drop things FASTER to make that blood trail a moot point. But like I said earlier, I will probably try a .223 for spring bear. We don't need a .223 because the kids I take out do just fine with my 308. Between the suppressor and the weight it has extremely minimal recoil. The .223 would really be nice on our fall mountain hunts, which is where the brush is thicker and a good blood trail is nice. So we might try a .223 in the spring where it is a safer experiment. If it goes well I would love to carry an AR15 for our mountain hunts.
Dropping things faster? Depends.

Delivering the desired wound channel on demand at the distance desired with the ability to spot my hit and make an immediate follow-up shot(s) from field positions from a robust and reliable delivery system is what I’m after. Also, the .233 give you an opportunity for purposeful practice with relatively low cost and low punishment.

The wound channel delivered by a 77 TMK may or may not deliver a more effective wound channel than the .308 projectile you’re killing things with.

That said, I’m 99.9% confident in the 77TMKs ability to deliver a lethal wound channel in ANYTHING inside of 450 yds. As an added bonus you can keep pressing the trigger and shoot them to the ground.
 
Any idea how much weight was saved? Or just how heavy it is now? Looks like something I might try.
I found some TMKs and ordered 200. My family has some 223 rifles laying around. Hopefully try the TMKs this spring. I'm still a but hesitant though. Can anyone comment on whether a 6.5 Grendel or 300 Hamr might produce more reliable exits? I'm buying the argument that with a TMK the 223 will kill reliably Just like big blood trails.
Under 2lb now. IMG_2718.jpegThe laminate is very strong so you can remove quite a bit of wood. I did it over completely using course sandpaper around the grip and forend as well as cutting the butt out.

This bottom pic 319 yd head shot with 69grn TMK. The laminate provides a very stable platform for the little model 7.

IMG_5368 2.jpg
 
Last edited:
Anyone have a 16.5” barrel and wish they went longer?
I have a ruger american ranch that’s 16 inches and I like it but I don’t at the same time. It’s super easy to move around in tight spaces like a deer stand but incredibly loud since I don’t have a suppressor. You could also get more velocity with a longer barrel. Just some things to think about.
 
77grn Sierra Tipped. Low shoulder shot at 188 yds. Just took a few steps. Projectile just under skin on off side. This is the first one of many that I have found that was completely intact. No external blood at all - all of the damage was inside.
 

Attachments

  • FullSizeRender 3.jpeg
    FullSizeRender 3.jpeg
    121.4 KB · Views: 101
  • IMG_7767-1.jpeg
    IMG_7767-1.jpeg
    519.5 KB · Views: 101
Last edited:
Anyone have a 16.5” barrel and wish they went longer?
I have a 18” with can. It feels long but I’m used to SBRs and shorter guns. I don’t have many shots over 200 yards around here. But the added FPS is nice for longer pokes. Look at ballistic charts, figure in your average/max shot ranges and go from there. A few places I hunt would benefit from taking my 12.5” over the 18”. Especially if I’m mobile hunting some of my public lands.
 
Back
Top