.223 for bear, mountain goat, deer, elk, and moose.

Veloci_Wrench

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Apr 16, 2022
Messages
222
Does anyone plan on using PSA's Sabre 75g ammo on an animal this year? I only get one buck tag for all of deer season, or I would plan to try them out alongside TMKs.
 
Joined
Dec 28, 2019
Messages
1,930
The difference is shooting groups in the .1's at 100 yards and putting rounds in the same splash on an IPSC at 1000 yards vs just hitting it.

If you're happy with 1MOA then carry on with cheap dies. I personally want to know my round is going to be as accurate as can be when I send a round at something because stacking variables is how you miss or make poor shots.

The fact your gun supposedly shoots .10 MOA is actually irrelevant for hunting purposes out to 500-600 yards. That’s impressive grouping though for bench rest competition.
 
Joined
Nov 28, 2022
Messages
749
Playing with the Applied Ballistics app variables shows you how little your group size matters vs being 1MPH better at calling wind.
 

Reburn

Mayhem Contributor
Joined
Feb 10, 2019
Messages
3,470
Location
Central Texas
The difference is shooting groups in the .1's at 100 yards and putting rounds in the same splash on an IPSC at 1000 yards vs just hitting it.

If you're happy with 1MOA then carry on with cheap dies. I personally want to know my round is going to be as accurate as can be when I send a round at something because stacking variables is how you miss or make poor shots.

How many legit on demand sub moa HUNTING rifles do you have?
I would love to hear about these setups. Seriously.
Who spun the barrels with which reamers?
 

mstei4

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Apr 27, 2020
Messages
112
Location
SE Idaho
Color me "anxious" to try out my Rokslide Special on deer and elk !!

Here's a thought: How about accounting for every shot you fire at an animal with the 223/TMK combo?
First shot hit or miss? Vitals or wounding? Follow up shots?

I believe (forgive me form ;) ) the rate of first shot fatal hits and similar follow up shots will be higher than practically every higher recoiling round but, as this thread attempts to show, evidence trumps belief.

I'd like to see the same for the big bang supporters.

Of course there are variables we probably can't quantify such as more experienced/skilled
shooters shooting larger calibers vs beginners shooting 223, etc. Even so, that would be an interesting comparison.

Maybe a seperate thread where anyone shooting any cartridge can "bare their soul" ?

a) Good idea?
b) Bad Idea?
c) stfu fng?
One very important thing that doesn’t account for is whether or not a follow up shot is even possible. Due to the dramatically decreased recoil a 223 should allow for follow up shots way more frequently, whether they are needed or not. Not saying it’s a bad idea, but it may reflect poorly in the eyes of some when “I hit 3 times with a 223” even though the first shot was lethal, and the two follow up shots were possible purely because of the reduced recoil. On the other hand some of us will view that as evidence in favor of the dramatically increased shootability of small rounnds.
 

Ryan Avery

Admin
Staff member
Shoot2HuntU
Joined
Jan 5, 2012
Messages
9,002
8ade80b11c988bfc34ce749cb75205b5.jpg

3e0c81eeee8ff61ec969bf5a99a40fad.jpg


Apparently all you need is a scoped Tikka .223, ammo and a cinder block to get better.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
Last edited:

Tahr

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Dec 13, 2018
Messages
136
Maybe there's a bit of over thinking going on here. Its not difficult at all to get a couple of rounds into a deer before it tips over. There's often what I call the ".223 stagger" of a few seconds before an animal tips over. Mortally hit, dead on it feet. Follow up shot possible. Especially with lung shots which I tend to go for. No shame in a couple of shots..
I use Lee dies. Have never thought about them being "inferior" in any way. Its a pretty miserable .223 that cant do .75moa and every Tikka I have met has been well under that using Lee.
 

Rooggvc

WKR
Joined
Aug 8, 2022
Messages
611
I might need to off load the RPR and get the Rokslide Special .223 going. It would probably do a world of good for my shooting.
 
OP
P

PNWGATOR

WKR
Shoot2HuntU
Joined
Oct 14, 2014
Messages
2,748
Location
USA
One very important thing that doesn’t account for is whether or not a follow up shot is even possible. Due to the dramatically decreased recoil a 223 should allow for follow up shots way more frequently, whether they are needed or not. Not saying it’s a bad idea, but it may reflect poorly in the eyes of some when “I hit 3 times with a 223” even though the first shot was lethal, and the two follow up shots were possible purely because of the reduced recoil. On the other hand some of us will view that as evidence in favor of the dramatically increased shootability of small rounnds.
100% the opportunity exists to keep shooting and deliver more than one round into the vitals in a controlled fashion.

Shoot your game animals to the ground. Stay on the gun, run the gun, learn/correct from your first hit and keep shooting.

Extremely effective method for filling the freezer.
 

ShootOkHuntWorse

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
May 23, 2020
Messages
205
Im extremely pleased with my rough RSS. Trijicon accupoint 3-9 and 24.5grains of tac at mag length had an SD of 3fps over 3 rounds so I stopped there to not ruin my hopes. Was getting consistent hits out over 700 before my scope runs out of elevation. I dialed the accupoint for 70 rounds from bottomed out to 24moa above my zero and never felt like it wasn’t tracking correctly. Not enough for a novice like me to notice. 2833fps was my trued velocity from StrelokPro. Got DA using the same aviation chart Form has posted previously. Between strelok and a rough understanding of the altitude I was within the ballpark of a kestrel every time. I need a small thermometer on my pack or something.
Things I would change; 1. Sacrifice the weight of the scope for the tenmile FFP and a zero stop. I have my zero marked in number of revs from the bottom but it’s a hassle to do that repeatedly. 2. Try the tikka vertical grip. I might not like it for N.Idaho hunting situations. 3. I want a suppressor.
IMG_8376.jpeg
 
Joined
Aug 10, 2019
Messages
2,587
Location
Lowcountry, SC
Im extremely pleased with my rough RSS. Trijicon accupoint 3-9 and 24.5grains of tac at mag length had an SD of 3fps over 3 rounds so I stopped there to not ruin my hopes. Was getting consistent hits out over 700 before my scope runs out of elevation. I dialed the accupoint for 70 rounds from bottomed out to 24moa above my zero and never felt like it wasn’t tracking correctly. Not enough for a novice like me to notice. 2833fps was my trued velocity from StrelokPro. Got DA using the same aviation chart Form has posted previously. Between strelok and a rough understanding of the altitude I was within the ballpark of a kestrel every time. I need a small thermometer on my pack or something.
Things I would change; 1. Sacrifice the weight of the scope for the tenmile FFP and a zero stop. I have my zero marked in number of revs from the bottom but it’s a hassle to do that repeatedly. 2. Try the tikka vertical grip. I might not like it for N.Idaho hunting situations. 3. I want a suppressor.
View attachment 588020

Boringly awesome rifle. :)

Kestrel DROP works well with Strelok. Then you just need range and guess the wind.
 

amassi

WKR
Joined
May 26, 2018
Messages
3,960
Im extremely pleased with my rough RSS. Trijicon accupoint 3-9 and 24.5grains of tac at mag length had an SD of 3fps over 3 rounds so I stopped there to not ruin my hopes. Was getting consistent hits out over 700 before my scope runs out of elevation. I dialed the accupoint for 70 rounds from bottomed out to 24moa above my zero and never felt like it wasn’t tracking correctly. Not enough for a novice like me to notice. 2833fps was my trued velocity from StrelokPro. Got DA using the same aviation chart Form has posted previously. Between strelok and a rough understanding of the altitude I was within the ballpark of a kestrel every time. I need a small thermometer on my pack or something.
Things I would change; 1. Sacrifice the weight of the scope for the tenmile FFP and a zero stop. I have my zero marked in number of revs from the bottom but it’s a hassle to do that repeatedly. 2. Try the tikka vertical grip. I might not like it for N.Idaho hunting situations. 3. I want a suppressor.
View attachment 588020

The vertical grip is still friendly for shooting offhand


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Top