200 inch typical vs 200 inch nontypical

Joined
Apr 22, 2020
Messages
73
How rare is a hard horned 4 point that grosses over 200? How much rarer than a nontypical over 200, is a 200 inch typical comparable to 220 or 230 nontypical ?
 
That is wild to me! Next question, would you rather shoot a 200” typical or a 240” non typical?
 
I’m going 240, mass trash, width. The whole kitchen sink. Have yet to see anything that would resemble that in real life
 
That’s interesting, I’ve definitely seen more non typical than typical that score over 200 but had no idea they were that much more common
 
Give me a nontypical that looks like a big 4x4 typical but with droppers and lots of trash. I love my deer and women a little on the trashy side.


Something like this…

I’ll take this typical over that non typical.

794cf7c46475f8769cd208b5aa8eb932.jpg


The trashy antlers just don’t do it for me.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
 
If the deer was over 200" I would take most non-typicals over clean typicals. I dont care for the non-typicals that are just a clump of mass with points. My favorites are non-typicals with random cheaters and especially droppers. The buck in my avatar was standing next to a bigger clean typical when I shot him.
 
How rare is a hard horned 4 point that grosses over 200? How much rarer than a nontypical over 200, is a 200 inch typical comparable to 220 or 230 nontypical ?


A 200" typical mule deer is comparable to at least a 260" nontypical mule deer, if not 280".

People talk all the time about so-called "200 inch" typical mule deer, but the fact of the matter is that 80% of mule deer hunters will NEVER see a bonafide 200" muley in their lifetimes. They're exceedingly rare.

Hell, a 180" mule deer is rare. Most mature mule deer bucks in the western United States, on average, will top out at 140-160 inches. That's the reality.
 
Back
Top