LongWayAround
WKR
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2015
- Messages
- 3,867
Yeaagree. I helped a couple guys kill 160+- bucks this past year and they were understandably totally stoked on the hunt/expirence…
TheI am talking about are the social media/pod cast type “influencers” who want to act like they hunt 190”+ bucks then kill the same type of 160-170”+- bucks then take a wide or weird angle “for the gram” and then move states to kill another…. Then do it year after year.. Lots of then there…
Or I have 0 gripes toward anyone who gets a tag and gets a buck they are proud of even if it’s a forkey. Now the guys who kill 4 160-“ bucks for the gram and likes in 4 states, in one year = from where I sit are way worse than some guy sayin a 192” buck is a 200” buck. For real how many 160-“ bucks can a guy eat in a year….
I appreciate the clarification. I read a few of your earlier posts as saying a guy shouldn't be proud of a buck that didn't score well.
A few years ago I shot a 150" type of buck and was stoked, I had worked my ass off for eight days and finally had an opportunity. After a long stare-down with the bachelor group, I had a 50yd shot that required splitting the wires of a fence. That buck could have scored anything and it wouldn't have meant any more or less to me at that moment.
I also thought the recent rokcast on buck scores was interesting. If anyone hasn't listened to it, the jist of it was that whatever the antlers scored (160-200+), the average age of the bucks was about the same.


