1911’s in general, 9mm versions specifically
- Thread starter Formidilosus
- Start date
The mec gar metal Glock mags it ships with are good to go. The forward mounted HD rear sight is a backup, it’s useful for making sure your dot hasn’t shifted, and it’s theoretically a better surface off of which to rack the pistol than the optic. If you’re not mounting an optic, you’d probably not be looking at the HD anyway.
-J
What about the initial single stack C? Any thoughts on them?
What’s the roll trigger kit of choice? Or do we have someone like KC Crawford or Doug Hall do it?
-J
-J
OP
OP
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2014
- Messages
- 11,884
The HD is blocky and square like a Glock. A very good “not Glock” Glock duty pistol. But, given a choice the grip of the C and CS are much better shaped- thinner side to side than front to back.
OP
OP
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2014
- Messages
- 11,884
Very good pistols. If they still made them, they would be the answer for a production CCW pistol.
OP
OP
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2014
- Messages
- 11,884
@Formidilosus @RockAndSage
So this has been danced around and good input given, but to put a fine point on it -
Say a guy was looking for a first pistol and looking at a G19 because everyone says that's the standard for a do everything gun. He wants it for carry (probably appendix), bears/woods, and will put it on the nightstand at the end of the day. He wants to spend G19ish money ($500-600).
What would you steer him towards? That guy was me about 5 years ago and I went G48 (slim grip/profile was very appealing, and 15 round shield mags sounded great. I've gone back to the factory 10-rounders). Thinking of changing to a 1911, and a single stack commander size Tisas (with Wilson extractor and maybe some trigger work?) seems like the way to go.
I've been dot-curious, but never really felt like the Ameriglo sights on my G48 were holding me back more than my lack of skill. Getting my slide milled and buying a dot has always felt like a much smaller improvement than I'd get from buying another couple thousand rounds and just shooting the damn thing. Do I get one that's dot-ready? How about a rail for a light? I always always have a streamlight 500 lumen clipped in my pocket, but I suck at shooting strong hand only even more than I do with two hands. I'm not crazy about the increased size and weight of a cool-guy light and dot equipped pistol (especially with the weight gain of going from a G48 to a 1911). I've spent a little time with dot equipped pistols, but it has mostly been just plinking. I could see how they would need lots of training under stress, otherwise they are not the silver bullet lots of guys say they are in a time/stress pressure situation. With time, pretty sweet.
What would you recommend a guy do if he didn't want to get sucked too far in, wanted one do-it-all pistol that just works and shoots well, and didn't care about cool-guy points (what the G19 is often thought to be)? Wants to shoot 1k-2k rounds a year, but no aspirations of ever being a truly good shooter?
So this has been danced around and good input given, but to put a fine point on it -
Say a guy was looking for a first pistol and looking at a G19 because everyone says that's the standard for a do everything gun. He wants it for carry (probably appendix), bears/woods, and will put it on the nightstand at the end of the day. He wants to spend G19ish money ($500-600).
What would you steer him towards? That guy was me about 5 years ago and I went G48 (slim grip/profile was very appealing, and 15 round shield mags sounded great. I've gone back to the factory 10-rounders). Thinking of changing to a 1911, and a single stack commander size Tisas (with Wilson extractor and maybe some trigger work?) seems like the way to go.
I've been dot-curious, but never really felt like the Ameriglo sights on my G48 were holding me back more than my lack of skill. Getting my slide milled and buying a dot has always felt like a much smaller improvement than I'd get from buying another couple thousand rounds and just shooting the damn thing. Do I get one that's dot-ready? How about a rail for a light? I always always have a streamlight 500 lumen clipped in my pocket, but I suck at shooting strong hand only even more than I do with two hands. I'm not crazy about the increased size and weight of a cool-guy light and dot equipped pistol (especially with the weight gain of going from a G48 to a 1911). I've spent a little time with dot equipped pistols, but it has mostly been just plinking. I could see how they would need lots of training under stress, otherwise they are not the silver bullet lots of guys say they are in a time/stress pressure situation. With time, pretty sweet.
What would you recommend a guy do if he didn't want to get sucked too far in, wanted one do-it-all pistol that just works and shoots well, and didn't care about cool-guy points (what the G19 is often thought to be)? Wants to shoot 1k-2k rounds a year, but no aspirations of ever being a truly good shooter?
I bought one recently…really like the gun. Easy to shoot well and I’ve had zero hiccups. They are on GB often…expect to pay $1700-2000 for one. The 9 round Wilson compact mags work perfectly in mine.
RockAndSage
WKR
That is certainly a minefield of controversy in answering all those questions honestly. But all good, fair questions. Given you're asking that level of detail, I trust a detailed answer, if long, is also appreciated.
Here are two top-line principles that govern my worldview on all of this:
1) Only hits count.
2) Mindset, skillset, toolset - in that order.
On one hand, nothing else matters more than hits - so dog$h*t triggers, funky ergonomics, crap sights, and any other "theory" facet of a gun that interferes with the ability to rapidly hit over other designs, gets those guns sent to the bottom of the pile.
But even the junkiest of those guns can be made to hit, if your mindset and skillset are squared away.
Where people go really wrong, really fast, is not knowing their instructor's zero. Or the zero of whatever influencer it is they're paying attention to. Not knowing the origins of their priorities, values, and survival perspectives. Because what matters to a former SOF operator at the deepest levels of his instincts and cultural DNA is different from what a SWAT officer, street cop, gun gamer, or YouTuber will be. They're often also at a much higher level of training than the average person, and may take things for granted that common shooters just don't know. The danger is that those are the people who generally define what cool is - and that's dangerous as hell. People shouldn't be making life-altering gun decisions based on what's "cool" according to someone absolutely divorced from your own realities. Those people's worldviews have been formed in a very different survival reality than the one you walk in. And unfiltered consumption of their info and content can warp your perspective away from understanding what your own survival realities and survival requirements are.
That's why I shared those two First Principles guidelines up at the top. Everything gets filtered through that first.
And what matters a hell of a lot more to the average person is not whether their gun can go a million rounds, or what Tier 1 unit is using it, or what Gucci factors it has - it's whether you can get 3 accurate hits in 3-5 seconds on demand within 15 feet, in any weather, in any lighting, wearing common clothes, and in any condition you commonly find yourself in, in the realities you occupy. Only hits count. Choose a gun that assists that as much as possible.
You have to see to hit, right? So sights and lights matter. A trigger that interferes with your precision should be avoided, no matter what theoretical reason people offer for it being "good". And if you want more than one hit, the gun has to keep going bang too, so there's obviously a reliability factor.
But does it need to go bang with unyielding reliability in muddy trenches and moon-dust hills? Or are the standards of your personal reality that it just needs to deal with EDC lint, nightstand dust, and a little neglect between lube jobs? What's the intended purpose and realities of the gun? How many rounds do you expect to put on that gun a year?
All this is brought up to say that there's a balance between shootability, reliability, durability, intended purpose, and how much training you can or will do with it.
I personally hate Glocks - because their dog$h*t triggers, funky ergonomics, and crap sights get in the way of my ability to hit with it fast and under duress. But if it was the only tool I had to do work with? Well, I'd be damn happy to have it, and the mindset would craft the skillset around the toolset. And there's thousands of elite shooters who have done the same with those guns, at top levels.
But I have other choices. And I'll always choose the one that gets those 3 lethal shots at 15 feet as fast and as accurately as possible, in any lighting, weather, or social conditions I may face, with the least amount of interference from design as possible, requiring the least amount of training time to overcome. Glock may be "cool", "proven", etc, etc, etc, but it's going to take the average person thousands of rounds of live fire and dry fire to reach the same level of performance they would get if you just stuck a reliable 1911, 2011, CZ-75 type, or DWX in their hands, with just a few hundred rounds. People hate hearing that, yet it's reality as I know it.
Now to answer your question explicitly: The G19 price-point puts severe constraints on maximizing both shootability and reliability.
But for an EDC and woods gun, at $600ish, maybe shooting a thousand rounds a year or so - I'd recommend finding a used Sig 226, 228, or 229, with a rail, and put a TLR-1 light on it. Some HKs would also be great options. Don't worry about a red-dot unless you're willing to double the price of the package, and double the training per year. Form's proven here that some of the cheaper 1911s seem to be doing great, but I know a hammer-fired Sig or HK is going to be reliable out of the box, including used, at the $600 price point, but I wouldn't feel that trust with any 1911 in that price range I didn't put 1000 rounds through first.
OP
OP
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2014
- Messages
- 11,884
Well, to start- why not just a G19?
Similar threads
Featured Video
Latest Articles
- Swarovski EL Range 12×42 TA Binocular Review
- Battle of the 2.0s: Seek Outside Cimarron vs Redcliff Floorless Shelters
- Quiet Kat Ranger XR Review
- Shoot2Hunt A Female Perspective
- Goodbye 270 WSM, Hello 6UM
- 2025 Head-to-Head Bow Test
- Sitka Ascent Pants Review
- TT#59 Wesley Warner Stalking Big Mule Deer Bucks
- South Cox: Big Bucks Under 20 Yards
- TT#58 Scouting Mature Bucks with Brad Carter