Search results

  1. S

    I propose the “Fair opportunity in America’s Outdoors Act”

    No need then for BLM to have any biologists, or for those biologists to have a budget then, is there?
  2. S

    I propose the “Fair opportunity in America’s Outdoors Act”

    The BLM seems to believe they are "primarily responsible for managing wildlife habitat on BLM-managed public lands, while the states are primarily responsible for managing resident wildlife populations...." Are they lying about spending federal money for habitat used by state owned animals...
  3. S

    I propose the “Fair opportunity in America’s Outdoors Act”

    What does any of that have to do with the state paying for managing habitat for animals they own? I mean we've been told point blank over and over by residents the animals belong to them and them alone, so don't the expenses associated with these animals also belong to them and them alone?
  4. S

    I propose the “Fair opportunity in America’s Outdoors Act”

    No need to sell federal lands. Just no federal funding used for any habitat management since the animals that use that habitat are owned by the state. Let the states fund the management of the habitat their animals use.
  5. S

    Lobbying Wyoming game and fish negatively affecting non-resident elk hunters

    Most of what you post is entertaining, in a "Dumb and Dumber" sort of way, but this little gem is one your best ever.
  6. S

    Lobbying Wyoming game and fish negatively affecting non-resident elk hunters

    Most true words I've read in a long time. I try like hell to avoid even working west of the Central Time Zone.
  7. S

    Wyoming Passes 90/10: The Worst Article You’ll Read This Year

    I wonder if there are any other hunting organizations working to reduce hunting opportunity.
  8. S

    Wyoming Passes 90/10: The Worst Article You’ll Read This Year

    I saw the writing on the wall 20 years ago and started doing just what you suggest. I've hunted Africa, Canada, Mexico, and South America all multiple times. If I've spent any more money than my buddies have chasing points and tags, it isn't very much, and well worth knowing for sure where and...
  9. S

    Wyoming Passes 90/10: The Worst Article You’ll Read This Year

    Could you imagine any legitimate organization wanting this clown in any leadership or public-facing position? It's bad enough to go on and on in public about things he obviously doesn't understand, but to also be so stupid as to not know when to just shut up and take the win?
  10. S

    Wyoming Passes 90/10: The Worst Article You’ll Read This Year

    Rubber and glue? That's a higher level of discourse than I've come to expect from you. And it still far exceeds your knowledge of the legal system.
  11. S

    Wyoming Passes 90/10: The Worst Article You’ll Read This Year

    Maybe if you have someone else read that post to you, you'll see I didn't propose anything. Now, get back to criticizing other's reading comprehension.
  12. S

    Wyoming Passes 90/10: The Worst Article You’ll Read This Year

    I haven't had any investment in hunting Wyoming, or any western U.S. state, for over 20 years now so I'm not butt-hurt. I just recognize a clown when I see one.
  13. S

    Wyoming Passes 90/10: The Worst Article You’ll Read This Year

    This is truly laughable with all of the wildly stupid, incorrect legal information you have posted. Truly, only a goddamned idiot would even pretend to be so certain of anything when it comes to tort actions.
  14. S

    Not watching the Super Bowl post.

    I'd like to interrupt the sanctimony for just a moment to ask which part of the Bill of Rights obligates a private citizen to listen to, much less support, speech with which they disagree. In fact, this particular instance seems to be a case of both parties exercising their rights. I ask...
  15. S

    Zeiss goes woke???

    It looks to me like they're just trying to be careful their own advertising isn't used against them by anti-hunters/gun groups. I don't require a company to go on a crusade in order to buy their stuff.
  16. S

    Elk .243 or 25-06

    No, an offhand shot at 100-150 yards has no relevance. At least not for me because I'm not going to take that shot. But you aren't just suggesting an off hand shot or a sitting or prone shot. Your suggesting at least 5 five times as many shots as anyone is going to take in hunting a situation...
  17. S

    Elk .243 or 25-06

    I don't shoot any magnum cartridges for anything I hunt. This about is you putting your money where your mouth is. You just pronounce this exercise valid without any data because it sounds good in your head. Or because your theory is nonsense and every adult in normal physical condition can...
  18. S

    Elk .243 or 25-06

    That isn't how it works. You don't get to demand data from everyone who disagrees with you, then just pull a target exercise out of your ass and demand everyone else accept it as gospel. It should be a simple matter for data driven person like yourself to validate the correlation of your...
  19. S

    Elk .243 or 25-06

    First, you'll have to prove your test, that was invented by another "some guy on the internet," has any bearing on someone's ability to fire one aimed shot under hunting conditions. You claim to big on data, so show us the validation data for this exercise. I mean, it would probably be fun...
  20. S

    Elk .243 or 25-06

    This is the crux of the entire argument. Unless one is willing to accept that larger, faster bullets identical to the smaller, slower bullets being discussed here cannot be shot accurately, the whole idea falls on it's ass.

Latest posts

Featured Video

Stats

Threads
352,595
Messages
3,718,234
Members
80,565
Latest member
MP_524

Latest Articles

Top