Zeiss conquest vs Swarovski SLC vs Maven B.5

Danger23

FNG
Joined
Nov 14, 2024
Messages
11
Looking for thoughts between the zeiss conquest, Swarovski slc 15x56 or jumping the Maven B.5 18x56.
I am ok with springing for the Swaro 15x56 and I’m sure most will say get the Swaro but I am curious if the money difference is “worth it” for the Swaro or if the Zeiss are just as good. Plus it looks like you can pick up conquest on some sales or pretty good deals on used. Also wonder if the benefits of 18’s are worth trying the Maven.

I have the Maven b1 10x42’s and spent quite a bit of time with them and my dad’s SLC’s side by side. The Maven glass is great and hangs with the SLC to my eyes but they are not near as comfortable and I am constantly adjusting them and I sometimes regret not going with Swaro.
 
Object of glassing is to find game.

If the optic is uncomfortable then you won’t be staying in the glass. Similar concept to optics with garbage glass: eye strain makes you take breaks.

Zero issue staying in my SLCs from before legal light to last legal light; minus some pit stops.
 
Here's a pretty comprehensive review of the Zeiss Conquest HD 15x56. He notes some issues with chromatic aberration which have also been noted over at the BirdForum.

Same reviewer's thought on the SLC:

Here's a thread at BirdForum re: Maven 15x56 that may or may not be useful:

Happy Hunting :)
 
I
Object of glassing is to find game.

If the optic is uncomfortable then you won’t be staying in the glass. Similar concept to optics with garbage glass: eye strain makes you take breaks.

Zero issue staying in my SLCs from before legal light to last legal light; minus some pit stops.
I should clarify. The Maven B1.2's are not as comfortable. But I have tried the B2 and they felt very natural and comfortable every bit as much as the SLC's for me and the B5 is same body as the B2
 
Back
Top