Who's going to buy tags for the shity units your to good for?I will. I won't draw every year, but I'll definitely pay that price for the unit I want to hunt.
Sent from my moto z3 using Tapatalk
Who's going to buy tags for the shity units your to good for?I will. I won't draw every year, but I'll definitely pay that price for the unit I want to hunt.
I'm assuming people who want to hunt antelope every year and can afford to do so.Who's going to buy tags for the shity units your to good for?
Sent from my moto z3 using Tapatalk
Every state should be limited NR draws. I think they should do away with preference points though and make it pure lottery style.
Sure fire way to decrease NR funding. I’m not throwing my name in 20-some hats a year with no idea how many tags I’ll draw.
That's the idea... demand has so far exceeded supply that something needs to happen. I would be in favor of a random system that also used preference points. For every point you have, your name is in the hat an additional time. That's really the only way to sustain this thing imo. The PP game has a time limit before it becomes ineffective at drawing in the masses because there aren't enough tags to keep people cycling through.Sure fire way to decrease NR funding. I’m not throwing my name in 20-some hats a year with no idea how many tags I’ll draw.
Technically yes, but not in practice. Less than half of point holders actually apply for a hunt in Wyoming.Preference point game is already there. Almost 38,000 NR in WY with 1 elk preference point going into the 2021 draw. If you buy a point this year you are starting out #38,000 in line.
That is called a bonus point system. Some states do this already.That's the idea... demand has so far exceeded supply that something needs to happen. I would be in favor of a random system that also used preference points. For every point you have, your name is in the hat an additional time. That's really the only way to sustain this thing imo. The PP game has a time limit before it becomes ineffective at drawing in the masses because there aren't enough tags to keep people cycling through.
Naw not me, I’d rather spend that on elk tags.600 for antelope?? Are guys really willing to pay 600 to go year after year? That is even more than AZ, and double or nearly double that of NM, CO, NV, ID.
You mean a Bonus point system, like AZ and some othersThat's the idea... demand has so far exceeded supply that something needs to happen. I would be in favor of a random system that also used preference points. For every point you have, your name is in the hat an additional time. That's really the only way to sustain this thing imo. The PP game has a time limit before it becomes ineffective at drawing in the masses because there aren't enough tags to keep people cycling through.
or AlaskaBefore long it’ll be cheaper to hunt Africa.
I know a couple guys that do this. Its not necessarily cheaper but when you add in the success rates, it wins for them.Before long it’ll be cheaper to hunt Africa.
That is called a bonus point system. Some states do this already.
WOGA's way of looking out for the NR hunter is lobbying for the Wyoming wilderness law. I can live with every other thing these states do in terms of draw/lottery/preference point/tag cost etc. But, the Wyoming wilderness thing just chaps me. I've spent a lot of time hiking the wilderness areas in Wyoming without a babysitter. And it always bothers me that I can't also hunt there without one. First world problems I know. But, WOGA can pound sand.So Sy Gilliland, of WOGA, sends us an email today of how this proposal will “hurt our(NR) future chance of hunting WY”, and to get in touch of those legislators. He says nothing related to the state holding our NR elk tag fee for 4+ months. Easy to see he’s just worried about his pocketbook, and not that of the NR applicants
That is called a bonus point system. Some states do this already.