and just a few pubes to pick off the filter, no biggie
and just a few pubes to pick off the filter, no biggie
This stuff does come up every year and gets shot down. Nothing like a good doom & gloom discussion.
Since we're here: $600 for an antelope? LOL! Since I already have points, I will see this one thru. That'll be it, absolutely it - done. Was gonna do another one but not if the fees go up too much and it seems like it is gonna happen before then so will save the point fees and call it done.
This may reduce the demand - The folks with lotsa points will see it thru, the ones with no points aren't gonna go every year.
Those loaded questions are now unloaded. We don't own squat and don't have any say in the management or use of said lands or animals.
Western big game licenses sales could be the one business where the customer has almost no say and is treated like a second class person. I don't mind caps, don't mind paying a bit more for the opportunity, but cutting quota and charging double is crazy. Heck of a business model.
here are numbers from 2020 https://www.fws.gov/wsfrprograms/Subpages/LicenseInfo/Hunting.htm
Resident $6,744,619 Non Resident 19,355,046 Total 26,079,665
Based on those figures 74% of revenue comes from out of state.
There are far more NR fishing licenses sold than there are hunting licenses in almost every western state. You are correct that it's apples to oranges, in favor of fishing license sales.Not near the numbers of people come to fish as they do elk hunt. apple to oranges comparison
You can't see the forest for the trees. You are looking at tag revenue. You are missing the point about there being so many more people who fish than there are that hunt. You think they don't eat out? Get hotels? Buy gas? Shop in small towns? You are leaving a huge economic metric out of it.Here are 2020 fishing dollars for Wyoming, no where near the money hunting generates
WY Resident fishing 2,047,574 Non Resident 4,768,785 Total 6,811,359
Here are 2020 fishing dollars for Wyoming, no where near the money hunting generates
WY Resident fishing 2,047,574 Non Resident 4,768,785 Total 6,811,359
Agree that is a metric that should be considered for the state overall. I am looking at how the state organization that manages critters and fish is funded. All those other metrics don't got to Wyoming Game and Fish.You can't see the forest for the trees. You are looking at tag revenue. You are missing the point about there being so many more people who fish than there are that hunt. You think they don't eat out? Get hotels? Buy gas? Shop in small towns? You are leaving a huge economic metric out of it.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
That seems low:
View attachment 269785
So if the “combined” funds follow the 77/17 split, the 25% are funding over 80% of WYGF. If and when this bill passes, 10% of us that don’t live in Wyoming will be funding over 80% of WYGF. How long do the residents think that will last? I’m HEAVILY invested in hunting Wyoming and I’m not what I would consider a “casual” hunter...ALL my disposable income and time goes to hunting...this gives me pause. I’m more worried about the loss of opportunity than the cost. When I signed up for AZ years ago I signed up for “up to 10% of the tags. When NM cut NR opportunity, I did drop NM. When I signed up for WY, I signed up for 25% of the tags and I calculated out I would eventually draw a sheep tag before I died. Now they are taking that calculation out to a number I can’t hit much less hike the mountains. I’ve got 10 years before I figure I can retire. I may have to make a temporary residency spot in WY for a year or two so I can get my sheep hunt in. One way or another I’m going to figure out a way.
Nope, they will be selling lab manufactured meat in stores within the next decade.
Talk is cheap...if hunting was a real priority, they'd already live here...like I have for the last 21 years.My solution is to move to WY. Plenty of others will do this as well.
Talk is cheap...if hunting was a real priority, they'd already live here...like I have for the last 21 years.
Not that I don't disagree with your premise, but hunter's eat out, get hotels, buy gas, and shop in small towns. I would bet money that the average time spent visiting is longer for hunters and the guys fishing have to make up $20,000,000 from the word go.You can't see the forest for the trees. You are looking at tag revenue. You are missing the point about there being so many more people who fish than there are that hunt. You think they don't eat out? Get hotels? Buy gas? Shop in small towns? You are leaving a huge economic metric out of it.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Would it do any good to protest? no. Most residents will push it aside and say Non-residents are not a priority while ignoring the economic contribution NRs pay. G&F departments know they will sell all their tags and see an increase in revenue. Plain and simple G&F departments do not care about hunter retention or economic status. They care about money...they are government.I don't believe non-residents hunters will protest the price increase this year but what happens when we eventually have another economic downturn? States that are leveraging the bulk of their income on non-residents will have to adjust quickly.
If the senators thought they were getting flak from the non-resident's, wait until the price of a resident deer license has to be doubled in Wyoming or Montana.
Funny how the residents always complain about NR but NR is what drives the money to allow the game to flourish. Whether that be buying land, population estimations and all that good stuff. It would be funny if this passed and the NR did not buy anything for 1-2 years and then they would see the loss of 3/4 income annually...Western big game licenses sales could be the one business where the customer has almost no say and is treated like a second class person. I don't mind caps, don't mind paying a bit more for the opportunity, but cutting quota and charging double is crazy. Heck of a business model.
here are numbers from 2020 https://www.fws.gov/wsfrprograms/Subpages/LicenseInfo/Hunting.htm
Resident $6,744,619 Non Resident 19,355,046 Total 26,079,665
Based on those figures 74% of revenue comes from out of state.
It took me a few years but I finally made it last year Buzz. Loving it so far.Talk is cheap...if hunting was a real priority, they'd already live here...like I have for the last 21 years.