Here's the problem...how is PR funding allocated currently? You may want to look into that, nothing about it is tied to Federal Land ownership.
You, like many others, are trying to tie land ownership to PR funding as well as your alleged "right" to another States wildlife. Neither of which are correct.
If you're going to deny Wyoming, Nevada, and other states citizens access to our wildlife based on the notion that Federal Land percentages should be the deciding allocation tool, then states like yours should receive essentially ZERO PR dollars. You have zip for federal lands that NR can hunt, therefore very little PR funding.
Of course you have the trouncing of States Rights and existing federal regulations to over-come that absolutely give each State the right to discriminate against NR hunters any way they wish. And, you have yet to come with how to allocate PR funding based on Federal Land ownership without hosing states that have very few federal lands.
So I say, your option of Federal intervention is not viable and won't ever happen. Good luck with the campaign because you're going to need that along with convincing states to give up rights they've had for a couple hundred years.