WY Corner crossing update

[92xj]

I deleted all that talk.
I’m not interested in screwing someone’s spot even if muleyfever never hunts there again. Maybe I will try now

 

[jmez]

Saw an article the other day where Mt is sending letters to the judge and getting involved in this.

Sent from my moto g power 5G - 2023 using Tapatalk

 

[Marble]

Saw an article the other day where Mt is sending letters to the judge and getting involved in this.

Sent from my moto g power 5G - 2023 using Tapatalk

I saw that too. Not the state of Mt., but some organization of land owners and/or guides. Filing a friend of the court type motion.

I hope it goes through federally and makes it legal with clearer guidelines.

I listened to a really interesting podcast from Meat Eater with the attorney from the corner crossing case. Very interesting and laid some context to how things played out.

Sent from my SM-S918U using Tapatalk

 

[jmez]

The article I read Quoted the attorneys saying they it would extend to the entire west


Sent from my moto g power 5G - 2023 using Tapatalk

 

[Marble]

The article I read Quoted the attorneys saying they it would extend to the entire west


Sent from my moto g power 5G - 2023 using Tapatalk

If a federal decision occurs, then it would apply nationwide. That's why the land owner wanted it back in state court.

Sent from my SM-S918U using Tapatalk

 

[jmez]

That's why the billionaires will win in court.

Sent from my moto g power 5G - 2023 using Tapatalk

 

[Arctic Hunter]

It doesn’t surprise me at all that this group would try to influence the courts decision. It’s just further evidence that money and greed are part of the reason hunting out here isn’t what it used to be.

I hope it stays in federal court, sets a precedent, and states document its legality in regulation books.

 

[jmez]

That group influencing judges isn't what you need to worry about. Billionaires calling senators, said senators calling the judge are what you need to worry about. That's what will happen. The judge will be told how to rule.

Sent from my moto g power 5G - 2023 using Tapatalk

 

[Flyjunky]

That group influencing judges isn't what you need to worry about. Billionaires calling senators, said senators calling the judge are what you need to worry about. That's what will happen. The judge will be told how to rule.

Sent from my moto g power 5G - 2023 using Tapatalk

Exactly!

 

[Customweld]

That group influencing judges isn't what you need to worry about. Billionaires calling senators, said senators calling the judge are what you need to worry about. That's what will happen. The judge will be told how to rule.

Sent from my moto g power 5G - 2023 using Tapatalk

You can bet there is a bill already written up and sitting in someone's desk at the statehouse if the ruling doesn't go their way.

 

[jmez]

They won't risk trying to pass a bill. They will simply tell the judge no. People live in a dream world if they don't think that is how our country functions.

We live by the Golden rule. He who has the gold makes the rules.

Sent from my moto g power 5G - 2023 using Tapatalk

 

[Fartrell Cluggins]

I don't think that the folks who want corner crossing would like the outcome if this went to SCOTUS. Law has consistently held that property owners own the air space above the land that they own. How high up they own it is somewhat subjective, but it is always a substantial distance above any structures in the area.

This ownership of the air space would preclude trespass and construction in that airspace.

This clearly falls within the boundaries of eminent domain though. The state government should take the land under eminent domain and compensate the land owners for the value of the few square feet that they take.

 

[Afhunter1]

What I think is gonna happen if there is an unfavorable ruling in the landowners favor then they are gonna petition the Fed for land swaps and swap blocks so there is no more checkerboard. They will swap parcel to connect “their property.” Probably land lock the swapped BLM parcels.

 

[Fordguy]

Except that we still have the Unlawful Inclosures of Public Lands act.

 

[Flyjunky]

What I think is gonna happen if there is an unfavorable ruling in the landowners favor then they are gonna petition the Fed for land swaps and swap blocks so there is no more checkerboard. They will swap parcel to connect “their property.” Probably land lock the swapped BLM parcels.

Any public property that is not accessible by the public should then not be paid for by said public.

 

[Afhunter1]

Any public property that is not accessible by the public should then not be paid for by said public.

That would be nice if that’s how it worked.

 

[Flyjunky]

That would be nice if that’s how it worked.

Why should the public pay for land locked property that only the private landowners can access?

 

[Afhunter1]

Why should the public pay for land locked property that only the private landowners can access?

I’m not saying they should. I’m just saying they do. Ha ha

 

[Fartrell Cluggins]

Unlawful Inclosures of Public Lands act.

Do you have a link for that act?

 

[DoctorJJ]

Do you have a link for that act?

Interested in this as well. Never heard of it til now.