Would you buy this scope?

[propulsionclimbing]

I like the idea of a deposit. I would be down for 2 and would be willing to wait until they are available without bitching.

 

[clperry]

I’m in for a couple to start. Deposit is fine.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[9487329]

@Ryan Avery does higher quantities mean better margin for you guys? That would be cool. At this stage I think limiting # per person would hinder getting the ball rolling (but 2nds and 3rds might be the most likely to cancel )

 

[santacruz]

What he said.

(Although you guys with your $100 deposits ... I'll put down $1000 non-refundable. But I guess that would constitute a pre-order which I'd previously advised against ... so I'll just take my own advice and shut up and let the guys get on with it. )

I'd match you. In my mind, the process already speaks for itself. High confidence by virtue of the drops. I'm definitely in.

 

[glock233]

Dude bite the bullet and switch

That’s a $15k+ bullet plus I’d be the only one in my hunting crew. It just doesn’t make practice sense for the modest benefits.

 

[ztc92]

I agree with others, a modest, no refundable deposit like $100 that goes towards the purchase price seems like a good plan.

I would also be happy to be part of an initial group that could serve as a “beta-test” for the first order of scopes. Given the price is already great, no further discount needed. Just let us buy one from the initial batch and let the reward for “beta-testing” be getting to use a likely great scope earlier than others.

 

[diverc18]

$100 deposit is minor for scope that can be dropped 45 times lol. Sign me up for the preorder

 

[LFaler]

I’m in for 3

 

[Q_Sertorius]

“And my axe!”

I am definitely down for one 3-18. I’d be happy to put in a $100 deposit

 

[eawa0124]

I'd be in for two.

 

[HighUintas]

You guys getting ahead of yourselves. It needs a full and thorough evaluation. Love the process

 

[Dualsight]

@Formidilosus

There has been a lot of good suggestions thus far. Some are suggesting “do it right” (whatever that could mean), others have suggested simulated tests, and others just want to buy it now. My take is that you prefer to have it thoroughly tested, you know how to do this, and it is going to take time.

Of course, since you are dealing with such a diverse audience, there may be something you haven’t thought of or there just isn’t enough time to explore all the variables that can exist. What I have not seen, or missed, is a suggestion laying out specific criteria to statistically analyze the product with a set of variables normally encompassing too much time to perform; at least too much time by one individual.

Here is an example, if you don’t like this idea, then ignore it. If it doesn’t suck too badly use whatever part(s) you like:

• Have LOW produce a sampling number to your liking 6; 25; 100; whatever sampling amount you believe is sufficient.
• Interested participants send in a “resume” meeting with certain criteria (examples):
• Must specify what caliber and what action the scope will be mounted.
• Must keep an accurate record and must be on XXXX (Excel, for example).
• They are hand-picked and must purchase the scope.
• Criteria – Variable (examples)
• Criteria: Must document scope mounting procedure – Variable: How was it mounted.
• Criteria: Torque to 18 to 25 in-lbs. – Variable: Document the torque.
• Criteria: Must shoot XXXX number of total rounds. – Variable: They choose how many rounds for each session.
• Criteria: They must ride or drive XXXX times with scoped rifle each week. – Variable: Horse, mule, ATV, UTV, pickup truck, as well a terrain, i.e., trails, gravel, cow pasture.
• Criteria: Must hunt with scope. – Variable: blind, spot and stalk, norther cold, desert, etc.

You get the idea. You can’t do everything and simulate all the variables. This way you have a team, and they might do some crazy things or have (no!!) situations along with data. Just a thought, and for everyone wondering, no, I do not wish to be one of the testers.

Not everyone will be happy waiting. However, testing will be more comprehensive with a larger sampling and will be completed more quickly than just one person trying to do everything.

 

[streamerfish]

My best guess on demand --- one for everyone who has commented or liked a post on this thread. Some people will want multiples and others don't want any. This is a terrible group to gauge real world demand. What this scope is is intended to do is what most people think their existing scopes will already do until they have a failure. Outside of this group, sales are going to be hard to gauge because your sales pitch is that most of the scopes out there, including ones that sell well, will let you down.

Good luck.

I think the sales pitch is the reticle. I mean sure, durability is good. But other scopes are durable.

Nobody else has a reticle that will work at all ranges, for hunting and target. Some kind of catchy videos showing how good the reticle is, thats the sale, thats the road to sales outside the "bubble".

At least imho.

 

[wyosam]

I’ll order one when available, happy to put a deposit whenever.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk