Would you buy this scope?

No doubt. All that concern seems erased with company chosen and parameters of this scope.
Given the choice tho, if things are equal on build quality I will learn toward the company with good customer service and company integrity or reputation as the decider.
Look at Maven for example, they build 1 scope that works and deny the fact that it's internals are different from their others. Dismissing the results of testing all together. They can pound sand in my book.
Maven’s CS is lousy. Both times I called with questions I got either outright lies, or someone speaking without proper knowledge.
 
I totally agree with the turret marking. This turret has the second rev marks covered with tape and the first rev .1 marks blacked out with sharpie. So so much easier on the eyes.

View attachment 1010313


I understand what you are saying with that picture, but you are in the extreme minority of people. One of the things that people have consistently commented on is the numbering and marks being so visible.
 
From what I understand there are two branches to their gear lines. The higher tier stuff is Japanese manufactured and finished in Australia, the lower tier stuff is Chinese.
This is also interesting. Fix the reticle and it could be a winner.

Also, please give us an option with a fixed wide-angle eyepiece -- and don't make me buy the zoom version and then pay extra to replace the eyepiece.
 
For everyone that is so concerned about who the partner is in the scope...

If the scope delivers everything you asked for and more, and meets your expectations based on Forms testing, at the price point that you're willing to invest...

Why does it matter who the partner company is?

If they never reveal who it is, are you NOT going to buy the scope?

If it's a company you don't care for... Are you Not going to buy the scope? Even after it's proven?
Good questions ... but was all covered a few pages ago.

Sheesh - it's as if you have something better to do than read all 2765 preceding posts! :)
 
Look at Maven for example, they build 1 scope that works and deny the fact that it's internals are different from their others. Dismissing the results of testing all together. They can pound sand in my book.
And it wasn't just that they dismissed the eval results, but they said something dismissive/derogatory about Rokslide/Roksliders overall. I can't now remember the exact quote - and have better things to do than go hunting for it, but perhaps someone quoted their exact words here. Pound sand indeed.

Which is a shame, because that scope still fills a niche, and it would have been nice to refer people to them without any qualms.
 
It is almost certainly my ineptitude but I can’t find the pictures and specs of this scope. Can someone tell me what page?
 
I'm liking this scope from what I'm seeing, glad it went to 18x.
Hard specs?
Fov °?
Fov in feet 100y 3x and 18x?
Total travel?
See it's 12.5" and 25oz on prototype.
Maybe a sticky is needed in optics forum for actual rokscope data, pics, reticle, evals VS everyone drooling or nit picking. 5 pages I went through and saw maybe 5 informative posts.
 
By selling it at a reasonable margin instead of concocting an artificially high list price to fatten up two layers of distribution on the way to the consumer, then add 50% LE/mil discounts.

Yup.

People would truly not believe the mfg margins on stuff.

One example is milk. From buying raw milk, processing (homogenize & pasteurize), to packaging and distributing, and paying everyone along the way, it costs about 19 cents to put a gallon of milk on the shelf.
 
It is almost certainly my ineptitude but I can’t find the pictures and specs of this scope. Can someone tell me what page?
They are scattered, wait till Dillo finds the time to post them up on a dedicated page or search this thread using his user name.
 
0085bcd04b326f62f8727798dee5c7c9.jpg
That is one sexy sight picture. And this one is too! Makes me want to go out and shoot something.
THLR 8x.jpeg
 
Yup.

People would truly not believe the mfg margins on stuff.

One example is milk. From buying raw milk, processing (homogenize & pasteurize), to packaging and distributing, and paying everyone along the way, it costs about 19 cents to put a gallon of milk on the shelf.
But raw milk from a rancher (or dairy that'll sell for non-human consumption) is $6 a gallon, cuz I've sought and bought it. So a market is truly set by what a customer is willing to pay.......nothing to do with cost of production.
 
Back
Top