Would you buy this scope?

[ReddingArcher]

I felt it move a little bit when I saw the reticle! It looks great I’m excited for this.

 

[bojangles808]

The scope is….




Fantastic with regards to reticle, eyebox, size, turrets, parralax- it is beyond what Ryan or I had hoped for.

3x
View attachment 1008217



18x
View attachment 1008223

Looks good. can you post a 7x or 8x view of the reticle plz?

 

[Formidilosus]

Looks good. can you post a 7x or 8x view of the reticle plz?

With the lighting and the textured wall here it was difficult to get a clear picture of the reticle.

8x

 

[Formidilosus]

There are multiple small design items that can be seen, that correct issues on other scopes:



Short elevation turret? Index finger touching the tube. It’s not tall.




Low profile windage- no problem.



Pinky tinger-

 

[redchinviking]

Looking better by the minute. Can we get an official weight?

 

[Ryan Avery]

The $999 scope that couldn't be made, or so we were told. If these three scopes are what I believe they are, we all win! Form and I set out to create a hunting scope that simply works, and at a price that nearly everyone can afford. If they pass the drop test It will set a new standard. A big thank you to the company that stepped up and said, "Let's do it!"

 

[NDHUNTER24]

Will we find out about who the company is today? A few of us might stroke out. Did you tell them you want a 2-8X36 already?

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk

 

[BAKPAKR]

The $999 scope that couldn't be made, or so we were told. If these three scopes are what I believe they are, we all win! Form and I set out to create a hunting scope that simply works, and at a price that nearly everyone can afford. If they pass the drop test It will set a new standard. A big thank you to the company that stepped up and said, "Let's do it!"

View attachment 1008358

@Ryan Avery, the big question, are there mirrors on the ceiling in your room?

 

[Bfish22]

My guess is bushnell. Looks like it could be an lrhs with updated turrets and reticle?

 

[BAKPAKR]

There are multiple small design items that can be seen, that correct issues on other scopes:
View attachment 1008352


Short elevation turret? Index finger touching the tube. It’s not tall.
View attachment 1008353



Low profile windage- no problem.
View attachment 1008354


Pinky tinger-
View attachment 1008355

Since I am a lefty, that low profile windage turret sure is appealing. The turret on the SWFA scopes often digs into my side when the rifle is in the gun bearer. S2H

 

[bbckfh]

With the lighting and the textured wall here it was difficult to get a clear picture of the reticle.

8x
View attachment 1008351

@Formidilosus: I remain unconvinced by your “MIL is clearly better” argument. I might argue that it’s easier to lessen the first time, and that I should teach my children it.

What’s unequivocal is that your reticle is clear and clean and useful! BZ! Well executed. Enough so that I might consider switching over from 40+ years of MOA and inherently understanding my wind holds.

Can’t wait to see it in the flesh.

Can’t wait to see the 2-8x36 (or even 2-10x).


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Wprinkle]

Just seeing the reticle and turrets makes my sticker peck out

 

[Axlrod]

@Formidilosus: I remain unconvinced by your “MIL is clearly better” argument. I might argue that it’s easier to lessen the first time, and that I should teach my children it.

What’s unequivocal is that your reticle is clear and clean and useful! BZ! Well executed. Enough so that I might consider switching over from 40+ years of MOA and inherently understanding my wind holds.

Can’t wait to see it in the flesh.

Can’t wait to see the 2-8x36 (or even 2-10x).


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

HaHaHa
You might consider switching?
End of the line posser. No scope for you!

 

[THLR]

Those 0.1 mrad hashmarks will be a single blur in twilight/under stress.

Remove .1-.2-.3-.4-.6-.7-.8-.9
That will leave whole and half.

It also makes it possible to trade off hashmark line height and gain significantly larger numbers.

Simple changes that makes a noticable difference for the shooter.


Are there really no dodgy forum members at SHOT who can do a trip-grab-run?

 

[SLM]

Looks good.

Athlon.

 

[dreamingWest]

I'm happy to see the turret indexing 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5. That seems to help my brain go even faster than if the labels are just 1, 2, etc. Minor detail, but I hope y'all keep it that way.

This scope looks great.

 

[Brandon.miller.4]

I thought I was content. Damn you a**holes. Where do I sign up?

 

[Chris in TN]

Looks neat. I'm not even going to ask for a moa version.


As for dropping it on the SHOT floor......back in the early 2000's a client told us how their entire staff ended up with new IBM/Lenovo computers and laptops. Both the Dell and IBM salesmen were in a meeting going head to head about various features and looking dead even. At the end of the meeting, as the story was told to me and the guy I worked for at the time, the IBM guy said 'well, will the Dell handle this?' and threw his IBM laptop onto the floor. It survived. The Dell guy declined to participate. The client bought all IBM.

I wasn't there and didn't see it happen but every computer in that office was an IBM.

 

[Gstew1930]

Damn!

Just seeing the reticle and turrets makes my sticker peck out

Fantastic song

 

[BAKPAKR]

Those 0.1 mrad hashmarks will be a single blur in twilight/under stress.
View attachment 1008370
Remove .1-.2-.3-.4-.6-.7-.8-.9
That will leave whole and half.

It also makes it possible to trade off hashmark line height and gain significantly larger numbers.

Simple changes that makes a noticable difference for the shooter.

View attachment 1008371
Are there really no dodgy forum members at SHOT who can do a trip-grab-run?

They just increased Form’s security detail based on the comment in your post!